Lifters; Crower vs. Erson?
I have the option to use Sig Erson lifters or Crowers.
These lifter are old stock 70’s/80’s so they should both be out of the date of the “problem metal engine parts”.
They are going in a 360 crate LA 9.2 comp.
360 1.88”,”596” heads (mild porting to open up bowls and light blend), Mopar Aluminum DP intake, 340 manifolds, true double roller from Mancini, P4120249 valve springs (up to .500 lift) Factory length Chrome moly push rods, and stamped steel stock rockers).
Comp cam is 268/280 277/280 and also new in the box but is from the 90’s.
I have had all these parts for this build for ages and they are all new in unopened boxes, worse for wear but the product inside is mint.
I know there could be more improvements but this 360La engine won’t see much track if any and I will be taking all the necessary break in procedures.
Anybody use Ersons or Crowers?
Pros and Cons of either?
I have the option to use Sig Erson lifters or Crowers.
These lifter are old stock 70’s/80’s so they should both be out of the date of the “problem metal engine parts”.
They are going in a 360 crate LA 9.2 comp.
360 1.88”,”596” heads (mild porting to open up bowls and light blend), Mopar Aluminum DP intake, 340 manifolds, true double roller from Mancini, P4120249 valve springs (up to .500 lift) Factory length Chrome moly push rods, and stamped steel stock rockers).
Comp cam is 268/280 277/280 and also new in the box but is from the 90’s.
I have had all these parts for this build for ages and they are all new in unopened boxes, worse for wear but the product inside is mint.
I know there could be more improvements but this 360La engine won’t see much track if any and I will be taking all the necessary break in procedures.
Anybody use Ersons or Crowers?
Pros and Cons of either?