'65 Mustang Hi-po vs '65 Formula S

Around 1971, my GF's (later wife) younger sister was attending Ohio U in Athens OH. She needed a ride back to school so my GF and I took her using their 66 Mustang coupe. We did the round trip in one day, probably 3-1/2 hrs each way with me doing all the driving on highways winding through the hills in southern Ohio. 289-2 and clunky 3 speed manual on the floor. I didn't drive fast at all and doubt that I ever floored it.
My everyday car was a 1967 Barracuda FB, 273 Commando 4 speed but not a Formula S, so 10" drums and no sway bar.

I was surprised at the difference in handling. What I remember is the Mustang had a wallowy front end and the tail was low. Why is it most of the vintage Mustangs are tail draggers?

Anyway, I thought my cuda was much more stable and predictable. I scored a lot of points with my future FIL when I helped him change the heater core in it. They had a new house built and moved in early 1972. That thing sat around for a few yrs befire he eventually junked it.
Yes, back in the early 1970's and 1980's the Early Fox body cars had no value. Ford had flooded the market and we called them Rustang's. They made Millions of 64-1/2, 65-66 Mustangs, most were I6 or 260 and 289 2bb. They left huge piles of Iron Oxide in many junk yards.

But Chrysler made 22,000 1965 Barracudas, most were \6 and 273 2bbl.

So, which are a true classic?