Stock 340 dyno tests?

Jeebuzz, I've never seen so many words say so little, while this thread starts to auger-in....
1) A dyno is more CONSISTANT, NOT more accurate.
2) The strip is more REALISTIC, NOT more accurate

DV had a 3rd party dyno an engine He'd finished while His were tied up, the results were amazing, and He knew they shouldn't be. He called the guy out for using the compensation to generate happy numbers, read; happy customers. You'd better know the dyno guy & be able to trust 'em if You want "accurate" numbers

The track is gonna give You real results,..for that day, baro-temps-humidity-tailwind/headwind-good lane/bad lane...a single cheesburger from the $1 menu vs a triple baconator, where'd You fill-up this time,.. if You actually know Your car You know, & what You've got now vs B4, if You're serious/a Pro You've got weather station/data/correction happy ****, I'm sure there's an "app for that" nowadays.
Most guys & gals ain't none of those things, they really aren't going to get any accuracy, but they can get the engine broken-in, timing & mixture dialed in, & maybe detect issues before they run over a crank or such..that's the best argument for a dyno, and We've had a Member here that got kinda boned all-around to that end as well.
Now put the wheels back on this thread damnit!!!!