SBM Edelbrock/Speedmaster Head Data

rumblefish360 said
Then why do you get behind it so much and defend it so hard?
You swore up and down and fought really hard for what…. Years that an engine that calculates to consume 600 cfm should only use that since a larger carb won’t produce any meaningful amount of extra HP but only give a worse throttle response, lower mileage and a crappier pedal feel on the road?

Never once have I ever argued that position, I've said over and over the carb formula is junk as a carb formula, It tells the approximate displacement of a running engine that's it.

rumblefish360 said
Dozens here argued against you but you stood proud until engine masters showed you wrong.

The applied science is in the program. What’s to argue about there! LOL!

So the formula over valves carbs?

People over value what that formula predicts is needed when choosing a carb.

Eg. A 360 @ 5500 rpm that formula says 450-500 cfm is the ideal carb I definitely don't agree with that outcome, never have/would.

rumblefish360 said
Is 1.5hg the optimal goal point? For you personally that is.

Nope, it just what basically the formula results would be.

I think your thinking of Hysteric he's the small carb/head guy :)