LSA Question

Years ago I had a 107 lsa solid cam that Dwayne specced.
A certain cam guy that I hung around with a bit at the time and who sold and specced cams convinced me to try one of his cams( he swore by and likes 112+ cams)
He was well aware of exactly what my combo was. He designed a cam very similar to what I had regards lift and duration( old was 260-266, 623 lift) new was 259/268 620 lift.
Installed new cam per spec, went to the track, and wow….
new cam killed 60 foot and ET. talking about 12-14 in the 1/4.
the only item that didn’t suffer was MPH. In fairness, it was virtually unchanged..
I didnt have a ton of compression(11.5) vert was 5200) and car was heavy 3350.
this was a 416 Eddie headed motor I had swapped the top end off of and went to W5 heads, beginning of the season. Ran it half the season, then in late June made this cam swap.
Conclusions I drew( right or wrong) was that if I had a lot more compression, and a good bit more vert, car might have actually ran as well or quite possibly better, but with what I had, it most definitely didn’t.
I believe wider LSA belongs more on a street car for better idle quality, or a light car, or a car that is going to use a power adder.
narrower LSA cam is more for a head challenged car, class car, etc.
Pretty much all our SBM, SBC and SBF engines are head limited. The Boss 302 was one that had too much head for the street. That is one reason to replace 128 in the formula with 132 for LSA selection. Also why GM LS engines employ wide LSA on their OE cams. In the Chev Performance catalogue they list two cams for circle track use. I believe these are ground on a 108°LSA as idle quality is not a major concern when running between 3000 and 7000 RPM.
The LS engines have pretty good port flow right out of the molds.