SBM Port Molds
LMAO, from one prick to another….
No, your being cryptic and insultive.
Incorrect on my behalf, it’s not why I won’t listen, it’s why won’t you listen.
Learned that long ago and you should have known that but then again, when your head swells up so much from being convinced, your ears close and your eyes become shut.
Pay attention!
Asserting an assumption as fact. You do this over and over which shift the goal posts, point of the issue, an obvious blurring of the lines and facts of what was said while twisting the conversation to suite your objective.
Don’t high school girls argue like this?
If you were actually serious about helping, you would have pontificated on the issue already, but yet, instead, you cryptically reply, and insult. Twisting words, and blurring the objective of the subject. You are so, not helping. Only a blind man or a complete idiot can’t see this.
Let’s see. I said stick a piece of string in the port. You can learn a ton from that.
And then it became about seat angle. Why should I explain something to you that you are incapable of understanding?
Let me say it this way so maybe you can grasp it.
If you are testing ports at 28 inches and that’s it, you aren’t learning anything. I test at 10, 28 and whatever the machine will pull for water column. What’s happening at overlap isn’t anywhere near 28 inches. Or even 100 inches. And what happens near and at max lift is maybe, maybe 10 inches of water column.
So when you test a seat at 28 inches, it may look bad. But at 40 inches (or more if you can get it) what looked bad now might look good.
Are you getting ANY of this? I can’t make it any more simple than that.
So a bogus test says that you lose flow (that all encompassing, die for anything to gain 5 CFM at .100 lift nonsense) at low lifts may not be actually true.
Again, if you live and die by the flow bench you will never figure it out.
Just like the 100% idiotic notion that a 30 degree seat, with whatever limit you put on lift (let’s say you decide you want to run .480 lift convention says that should be a 30 degree seat) is a proven power maker. It’s not. Not with any lift constraints.
That’s why I said (if you were paying attention) that lift does NOT matter when choosing a valve job.
Again, live by the flow bench, die by the flow bench. It will lie to you.
Summary: just because a valve job looks bad at a certain test pressure doesn’t mean that it is bad.
No one will argue (maybe they will hear of FABO because learning doesn’t matter here, orthodoxy does) that the seat is the single most important part of the port. And no one should argue that SHAPE matters more than anything.
So look at the shape of the flow cone around the valve comparing a 30 degree seat to a 50. The valve is the single biggest impediment to flow. Why are we not working to get the flow around the valve more efficiently regardless of what the flow bench may say?
Think on this. Or not. Some of you can’t learn. You’d rather argue that your way of doing things is all that.
