Does this prove David Vizard's 128 lsa formula ?

What I wonder is, say you figure the formula based on your combo. Like mine comes out to be 108. Is that what you need set in stone or is that a MAXIMUM or MINIMUM LSA?
Supposed to be optimal. To me should mean narrower or wider than calculated should lose torque, and it's generally accepted wider will, so to me loss in that direction isn't much proof of anything, tighter than calculated should also be shown to be a loss if the formula finds optimal.

I wouldn't have a problem if DV acted like it's a rule of thumb ball park etc.. But he sells it as it's gonna put you up there with the big boys and get 1.4+ lbs-ft per cid etc..