Did the 1979 Lil Red Express come with an air pump?

i find it all fascinating. i mean, not that it makes a lick of difference for what i'm doing, but it's interesting none the less.

here's a question on the 75~76 dip in power, was that in conjunction with the debut of lean burn? or was that when they went to the 8:1 compression vs. the 8.4:1?
I really doubt that a .3 drop in compression would account for that much power loss. I do suspect that the addition of the catalytic convertor, which in those days was very restrictive, single exhaust, carb and distributor changes for smog, lean burn, and other things like less cam caused the drop. The E58 in my old '79 W250 (club cab, long bed, 4.10s) never seemed to really lack power in my opinion. It wasn't fast by any stretch of the imagination, but would climb the Grapevine at speed (in a lower gear). I figure the fuel mileage was not terrible considering everything (8-9 in town, 13 on the highway).

One more note on compression. Our GTS (727, 3.23 open) had a '73 340 short block in it when we bought it and was topped with a pair of stock 318 heads. I got a pair of 340 heads and really didn't FEEL much difference. Replaced the short block with a '70 .030 340 with TRW 10.5 pistons. This was all with a stock 340 cam, intake, and AVS. There was no seat of the pants difference in any of the combos. Now, with that said, compression and heads start to make a bigger difference as the cam gets more aggressive.