Enlarging PRP doesn't always help

In the end of the day your getting 308 cfm with a 2.02 valve, your doing pretty good, doubt many would be unhappy with those results. Do you plan on playing around with with larger valves at some point ?
There needs to be a big asterisk beside that 308 number. As I mentioned early on, I have used all the cheat tactics that I could come up with to get that number. For instance, the combustion chamber has clay covering the spark plug and sometimes covering the whole exhaust valve. This creates a top angle 'cone' around the valve that adds a few cfm. I have tried to optimize my port entry plate for a good smooth radius. The guide boss in the port has clay in front and behind. So honestly it's more like a 295 cfm port. And it's easier to get a port that peaks at 295 at 0.600 lift then drops off (like mine) than it is to get a port that peaks at 295 at 0.900 lift with no stall or back up. It has taken PBR a whole lot of effort to get the ports he does. I'm on flow test 580 something and haven't figured it out yet.

I do plan on trying the larger valves, I'm just not going to give up until I get the dip out of the flow curve of the 2.02 valve.