318 Poly Flow Test

My 1966 Ford 289 installed is about 1.65". I talked to PAC springs for a recommendation, standard dual springs, not beehive. Summit hooked me up with 1.9", 1.55" valves with retainers and keepers for the Chev valves. Now need the money for the machine shop to install bronze guides and do the valve job going from 1.78" intake to 1.9" intake. Ordered the springs through Summit as PAC does not sell to private citizens.
The difference between 1.625" and 1.8" is very obvious with a tape measure, enough to know the beehive are not an option.
Then valve length is to be considered. Chevy are about 4.9", a bit shorter than my Ford valves. Worst case to get geometry correct will be lash caps.
Something to think about. I know the purists will be having a hemmorage over Chevy parts ruining a Mopar, but sometimes you have to look at what works for an inexpensive upgrade.
Dude, wtf does that have to do with comparing a Poly head to an LA head? And if You're a Mopar Guy with all of these tech answers, how do You not know or have a reference at Your fingertips what the installed ht. Polys have...??? Gary Pavlovich & crew have probably done as well as will be done with a Poly, with some modern upgrades, it may cough up a few more hp....but at what cost?? You should look up the Chrysler Power articles & anything related to the PolyPac folks, including the one run in the Engine Masters competition.....it's been done..
This was supposed to be a comparison thread, I thought anyways,......trick valves, custom lengths & springs can be done to ANY head....what is the comparison in results 'twisted wedge before twisted wedge was a thing' Polys vs inline wedge LA 'teener heads.