Don't read if you're close minded

273 said
Doesn't stop you from using the same example of a car going faster with a smaller carb over and over and over etc..

You mean the test where they dyno tune the carbs on a chassis dyno then take them to the track to see how they actually perform?

Was it the test where the engine ran fastest with 5 inches of vacuum at the top end with all those pumping losses?

Why did it run fastest and idle best with the smallest carb and 5 inches of vacuum?