Buddy I don't call you names.
You think we should change are minds just cause you say so, you think you've offered proof but you haven't nothing you have said so far is a valid argument.
Not that a majority matters but not one person has agreed with you but that gives you no pause no doubt that you might be in the wrong and just continue trashing us for not agreeing with you.
You are confusing them.
Were talking force and torque remember. A power stroke is torque, eg..1 cyl 2 stroke engine makes 50 lbs-ft it's making 50 lbs-ft per revolution, and if it happening at 5252 times per minute than it's also making 50 hp.
No one is saying this, for the same displacement like you mentioned 383 RB vs B, one it don't matter the hp it's the efficiency that determines the Imep, Bmep, lbs-ft per cid and if you notice none of them care how the displacement is made bore stroke ratio wise.
But back to your example the 383 B's larger piston is applying more force for a given psi but why it's not making more power but the same in your example is cause like I said in the beginning and since the 383 B also has a shorter stroke so it has less multiplication effect equaling out the torque and by extension hp. Now if you compare a 383 & 400 B engines same psi the 400 larger piston will be making more force but since now both engines have the same stroke the multiplication factor is the same so the 400 larger force becomes more torque than the 383 and if happening at the same rpm would make more hp.
You should've been able to figure this out if you really know what your talking about, you sure your right?
Again this formula has no bearing on what were talking about hp per piston surface area is similar to saying hp per cid, a given cid don't automatically make that ratio of hp same with the surface area of the piston, just a reference guide telling you how well you doing hp level wise.
Again if you think this was some kind of proof you should've known better if you know what your talking about, are you sure your right ?
