Don't read if you're close minded

Mean416 said
All these HIGHLY ANECDOTAL and THIRD PERSON...three times removed....accounts of guys talking about how dyno results don't translate to real performance. Lolz.

Couple points....

1. Dyno tech has definitely progressed since freaking 1970. Am I saying that the tests done back in the day were all garbage? No. But if you pick up over 100 HP and go slower... something is off in the combination. Or something was flawed.

2. All...ALL of the major racing teams today rely heavily on the engine dyno to test and evaluate changes. Serious efforts will have race courses programmed into the dyno to simulate real world dynamics.

3. Yeah that Boss 302 couldn't be made to work for road racing lolz View attachment 1716271401

Uhmmmm, the Z28 302, the BOSS 302, and the T/A block 340 destroked to 305 were all for one purpose....the TransAm racing series. If You had even the slightest clue of what You are talking about, You'd know that the TransAm teams running the BOSS 302s ended up filling about the whole bottom 1/3 of the 4V Cleveland Heads Intake ports because they were F*(king dogs getting back in the throttle & apexing/track outs on slower turns...fact...no amount of postumus dyno voodoo is going to change the reality..have a nice day.

EDIT: Hilariously, I just tagged on 273's Vizard Flow vs Velocity Thread, see posts #35 & #36, lololol.