Here you go, Piston area and force.

Bewy said
273.

Now you are shifting the goal posts, introducing more red herrings.

I am not shifting the goal post you seem to take issues that there would be similar psi capabilities so I'm trying to answer you.

Bewy said
What started this discussion was your claim that a larger piston area creates more downward force, increases hp.

I don't how many times I have to tell you I've never said more hp, I've stated from the beginning a larger piston will have more force for a given psi, that's what I claim now and that's what I claimed in the beginning and when it comes same displacements the larger piston greater force should average out the longer stroke multiplication of that force. Aka similar torque.

Bewy said
That only happens if the area increase produces the secondary event of drawing more air into the cyl. Unless additional air is drawn into the cyl, then a bigger piston area adds nothing.

Proof ? Since both cylinders have the same volume (same fuel and air potential), shouldn't they have the same torque potential ?

You tell me why the larger bore and shorter stroke in a 383 B, 408 B vs 383 RB, 408 LA etc.. Can't have similar average psi applied to the piston for more average force to be multiplied less by a shorter stroke for similar torque as the smaller bore and longer stroke engines of same displacement?

Just cause you say so or don't make sense to you ain't proof.