What would it take to make 1.44 lbs-ft per cid ?

273 said
Here another one I find interesting from Larry I kind of get it but not fully understanding why 2 speed gets away with higher velocities fps over 3-4 speeds ?

"from my Dyno testing along with Dragstrip testing this is what i discovered so far :

SuperStockers with 2-Speed Powerglide does not lose as much HP if an Intake or Exhaust Port has way too fast local CSA velocities
reason : 2-Speed has way less Engine RPM/SECOND rev rates -vs- 3 or 4 speeds
... so that the Chevy SuperStockers w/ Powerglides lose less HP

SuperStockers with 3-Speed Automatic Trans , such as, Chrysler SuperStockers have more HP loss with Intake or Exhaust Port that has way too fast local CSA velocities

SuperStockers with 4-Speed Manual/Clutch Trans lose even more HP "if" there's too fast local CSA velocities"

He said it. An engine bolted to a power glide will rpm slower than a stick.

Most engine dyno’s can’t measure an engine’s ability to make rpm.

That’s why two engines making 500 hp will have two different mph even if both cars are identical.

One will rpm quicker that the other. That means that engine is making more power cycles sooner. That’s more go sooner and the car is quicker.

Since there are far fewer stick cars out there, they get screwed the hardest on tuning and **** like that.

They are two totally different animals and that includes a transbrake car. It’s not even close to tuning like a stick.