Right not my deal.
As an engine builder I despise rule makers who think they need to limit engines to junk **** to level the playing field.
Bewy thinks you can innovate your way around ignorant rules. It shows his lack of experience.
Parity means mediocrity. I detest both.
If I sound like an 18 year old it’s because the truth hurt your little feelings.
Class rules like that are bullshit. He can run decent compression. He can have headers.
But we will **** them on an intake manifold to make it “fair”.
If you can’t see the absurdity in that statement you are just too bone headed to see.
At least FAST classes limit everything. It’s still more expensive than it should be, but at least they have rules that make some sense.
It’s damn near always the corner turners who want **** to be “fair”. It’s stupid.
As for Stock Eliminator racing, no one should lie to themselves and THINK an intake manifold other than OE would be slower than what they have are either full of **** or stupid.
Comparing Stock Eliminator to a corner turning car is overly simplistic.
They didn’t make the rule to make **** “fair”. They did it because it’s STOCK and they chose to keep that part STOCK.
Not the same.
So stop with your whining and put on your big boy pants. Stupid rules are stupid rules.
Truth is truth.
You should red X your dumb self. Or better yet, BLOCK ME. I get tired of clowns talking ****.
Bad rule, bad class. Simple as that. If the OP wants to run the class then who cares what the “real world” experience is? The OP will need to PAY to out innovate everyone else if he wants to win.
That burns through money. Fast.