Eric's cam challenge

273,
Thanks for posting.

I could never understand what this test would prove.....& still don't.

From what I could tell, all the parameters such as LSA, duration could be anything. So what actually is being compared?
In post #11 is what trends I see the worst ones generally have even though some of the top performers have some of the traits question is why, but generally they don't.

Post #11
The worst ones (bottom half of list) beside having seemly average wider lsa and less exhaust duration and overlap, the IVO seems to generally open later and EVC close sooner. Is what trends I'm seeing, the IVC & EVO variances seems to be somewhat averagely spread out from top to bottom.

One thing I notice ones with good hp but poor torque had similar traits in Post #15

Post #15
Seems like all the top hp ones had exhaust duration in the 250-263 ones under 250 didn't seem to do to well hp wise. The ones that had 250+ exhaust but that were in the bottom 13 places but made good hp also had 11+ IVO & EVC but had poor torque they also had IVC in the 49-51 range.