My cam numbers!
How does this 270/280/108 cam compare to the Hughes one below? They never have it on their website but seemed to be a good runner in an almost stock 5.9 magnum a guy on YouTube had. Always was curious and the cam in this thread reminded of just based on some of the numbers.
View attachment 1716320616
IDK, one is advertized, the other at 050
one is FTH and the other is a roller.
None of the numbers are comparable.
I can tell you that I ran a Hughes HE2430AL, a FTH cam with specs of 223/230/110 which at 11/1 was a smoking hot street cam and it delivered the mpgs too. This one was 270/276 advertised, and I ran it with 1.6 arms. I loved it .
IMO your if-it-is 270/280/108 would be hotter, and with better mpgs, and IMO, I wouldn't swap this FTH cam for the roller unless I had to have a roller, or the FTH was damaged.
If your cam turned out to be as guessed at, and
I didn't think the world was gonna go to chit soon,
I might offer you money for that dang thing. I believe it would be a heckuva nice cam in my 367.