Interesting. I haven't heard of this. Wonder why they didn't just measure the @ .050" specs? Unless this comes from a time back before it was common to do so. Maybe this was used as a way to compare data from old catalogs or something?
It seems odd to provide a formula to calculate the @ .050" specs and then state "do not use". Unless all cams were ground with the same profile from seat to @ .050" ...
Nevermind, looking at it from todays perspective the whole idea seems short sighted but I kind of get why they may have done this.