Suggestions for new design Aluminum Mopar SB clean slate (kind of) cylinder heads
No tough guy here. But you seem to want to overcome your crying about your poverty status by making the weak *** post.
Go complain somewhere else
I’m not complaining, YOU ARE.
and step away from your crack pipe. Lol.
Obviously, you and 273 are commingling in a pool of Green jello together smoking what you think I am.
Not looking for an argument, but we have 900 hp engines using stud rockers.
So if you were looking to build a 500 hp engine, you'd spend $1000 extra just to say " I don't habe chevy style rockers"?
I'm not even being sarcastic, I'm genuinely asking.
No worries my man! OK, I’ll leave you with;
One day a good friend of mine, a die hard Chevy guy says to me he wants to upgrade his stroker small block tunnel ram Pro Street Chevelle. Truly a no joke car capable of low 10’s. He says to me he is considering upgrading the valve train to a rocker arm in a bar set up.
So I ask him why he did t start with a MoPar to begin with because that set up comes stock from the factory.
He did t talk to me for 3 days.
A thicker hardened bar with a properly designed rocker arm that has good geometry will step all over a wobbly set up like Chevy has. Of course their is nothing wrong with making use of an inferior system dispite the amount of HP it’s on top of and with a little addition of a girdle, it does get better, but is still inferior to the way Chrysler did it. Buick did it, etc…
BPE will do what BPE does and what ever you do is what ever will be cost effective with the most financial return. Sorry, I see corporate getting into counting beans, not what is actually better, stringer and last longer. I see what ever makes BPE the most money being brought to production.
Idiots, like above, like cost savings not actual performance and what is actually better on all fronts. These morons are,,, well, idiot morons. Even better that you read again what he wrote to me as if I complained! LMAO!!!
TTYL Johnny Mac. Have a good one buddy.