To Resize Connecting Rods or Not?

Plus, as to the mismatched rod lengths;
it took me the better part of a day to assemble just the pistons, rods, and crank, into my 367 to get the deck heights to a tight average; cuz
The milled decks were not level front to back, no two rods were the same length, and, it seemed to me that my reground crank, did not have the rod journals all at the same distance to the crank centers. But, kudus to the KB107s which, if there was a difference in compression heights, I couldn't measure it.
Imagine what that assembly job would have cost, at the local engine shop.
------------------------------------------------
Later, after the rear main seal had to be changed twice, I discovered that the real problem was that during the line-hone that the engine shop had highly recommended, they actually bored it crooked, one end was way to high, and it was impossible for the rear main seal not to leak.
I took the engine out and down, then took the block back to the shop, who confirmed that they botched the job, and that the decks were now out to lunch as well. So, of course, I wanted compensation. which they were willing to give. But I had to supply a different core cuz this one was fubarred.
So I asked the guy, if I bring you a stock block on my dime; you will bore it, and deck it, and line-hone it for free, right.
Hyup was the answer.
and so, I dug deeper and said; What assurance can you give me that you won't muck the second one up, same as the first? or worse?
crickets.
I said no thanks.
I'm not rich; so that hurt. I went home and adapted a rope-seal from a 383. But it ain't perfect either. that crossed up 367 still went 93 in the Eighth, so, I'm not crying about it anymore.
In my case; 8 different-length rods actually worked out for me, as the deck heights came in pretty tight. and the engine now has over 100,000 miles on her. But, it was not a bolt-together deal.

And yes, I re-marked the rods, lol.