360 windage tray

I think that is ill advice and wouldn't follow it unless it was shown to me on a dyno as a power robber, power looser.

The thinking was the extra 360 stroke causes a problem being the tray was designed for the 340's smaller stroke.

3.58 - 3.31 = .027 difference in stroke. Half of which is on ethier end.
.027 / 2 = .0135 less room when this 360 crank spins inside the engine.

Do you think this is a problem and a power robber? I don't by it. No way, no how in any way shape and form. Sorry, I just can't see it. I just don't by it.

If anybody wants to argue, show me your dyno run slips and video.
Otherwise, please re-read the above parragraphs again.