Search results for query: *

I have made these for my project. Just a few details left, like a square weld on nut and some trimming. Let me know if interested. And Mega Parts have a good price on the Motor Mounts.

Yes, I´ll relax. Just watch me. And yes, one more thing before I leave. Did you post the picture you have, of Dick Landy´s, showing seat back rest was folded? If not, do it in the thread where I claim, seats were A-100 pick-up seats you could fold, not A-100 fixed Van seats... And of cause there...

You said: "LO stated he was there right on the line and yet you don´t believe him"? Why the question mark? Well, just because you are sooo Social Media. Throwing out **** not being able to back it up. I never said anything about not believing what he (LO) said. But I think I have a good picture...

Thats ok. I understand. You had nothing to do and felt like throwing some kit on that dumb Swede, who dared to stand up when called out...

Can you post a copy of that post? "no one knows more about hemi cars than me" I sertanly don´t remember having said that. Thats not like me...

Yes I´m a wannabe. This is what is happening when people who have the answers dont respond. Yes in this care you did but you had to add that "so many expert thing" I did not like that. I don´t know how many questions I have asked on this forum and other, and very very rearly, I get any respond...

No, you are right, I wasn´t there… In 1968 I learned how to shoot and drive a 50 ton Centurion Tank. In 1972 at the age of 23, I started farming my parents’ place. And in the evenings, I read Car Magazines. Now hold your laughter for a while. I wasn´t there, remember… In 1976 I knew enough to...

A picture I recently took of Jim Kramers Barracuda. So together from what I know, what Jim Schild says and total lack of any information saying the Cuda, when leaving Lynch Road had both bumper brackets, It´s outer bumper bracket delete. And you all, how about turning this discusson around. Go...

Nice, well it´s possible Chrysler decided this wasn´t gonna work on the hevier Dart bumper. But admit it, it makes sense, Chrysler wanted to remove all weight they could, from up front. Thank you. Lets hope outhers dear to chim in...

Yes, but tell us a little bit more about it...

So with this pic from a very valid car, and my first picture and together with the SS Guide, (Jim Schild) I´d say outer braket was deleted. Check...

I have many pictures from 1968-69 Car Magazine articles, showing front not beeing boxed. That´s why I draw the conclusion 383 cars were chosen, because they are the only model, both auto and stick model, having only the rear boxed.

Found this in my archive. Not sure I have seen it here or anywere else before. Anybody have any info on it.

No, only the radiator was used...

You mension the front lower tube lip. Yes, the originals had it cut too, for the same reason ofcause...

If I may chime in here... Body was shiped to Hurst less engine, hood and fenders. Door on, glass out, according to Tarozzi. To my understanding, only reason we are talking 383, is this was the only modell, both auto and 4-speed cars, had rear torque boxes. Not so much, but at least some...

Yes, like autoxcuda says and cost was a big factor too. Every cent... the 270 panel would sirtenly cost less, in that for every GTS panel made, two hundred or more, 270 panles were produced...

And, should I say, thanks to Hodge Restrations, we have a picture of how this warranty disclaimer looks like. I believe the only one on the internet. It´s from the restaration of Arlen Vankes Barracuda.

Yes, Thank you for taking the time and show us this. Let´s see if we can have someone else to chime in...

Yes, and here is a close to exact copy, of the original, that I have made. Note font and layout of the Hurst original in the middle and second pic, and of mine to the left. The color ofcause I had no ide of, what it was like other than sort of yellow. Figured something like an antifreeze sticker...

So, we have two posts, thank you, saying both brackets. But, like I said, in a forum like this it would be nice with a little more info...

In the SS Guide it says outer brackets were deleted. Can we nail that? Also I once read something about the brackets being made out of thinner than the OEM material? It would be nice, if we could get this relatively easy to confirme info correct, in this Forum. Don´t you think?

And still not one single good picture of an original SS 4-speed shifter in a Forum like this and in this specific thread like this. Very strange to say the least... I have manage, with help of a handful old pictures, to get the Shifter Handle correct but wouldn´t it be interesting to actually...

I was sneaky enough to pick the rad from my ´68 SB Formula S, before it went. Looks identical exept for #031 instead of 033, the BB rad has. But guess it is not easy to find one out of a 340 car either. Think there are even alu rads with a nice OM style top can if you look around.

Never seen this yellow sticker before. Next to the fender tag. Car was said to be so very original. Maybe it is, so what does it say? Also radiator is new to me, or did Chrysler have a couple different rads to choose from? Last pic the BB radiator you usually found when delivered from Hurst.

At least you recognize there were mods to the WW on the Mule, but nothing about it in your papers, good. Ok, but you don´t see a connection, between what Chrysler wanted to test, that worked and what they wanted to deliver. Good. I finaly got your oppinion. And, yes I will comment on those...

You are exposing your lack of insight in this matter, by comparing those cars, to the fact Chrysler wanted to test a car they knew would worked. And not deliver a deathtrap... Infact, under the shell of those cars you are showing, they might be exactly the same... Here is the picture "I said I...

??? wft´s matter with you man??… For the third time in a row, you bsing me about I can believe what I want, instead of giving us your opinion on the fact I describe… I was asking you three times, about the fact the Mule had the wheel wells modified, and you ducked three times… For you other...

And yes, paperworks is an important part of the history, but as we know, not every thing turned out accordningly. I´m thinking of the seat brackets and the K-member. What happened there? Can you find anything in your papers, explaning why Hurst didn´t follow the paperworks?

Yes, like I said, I was hoping you would comment on the fact that the Mule had WW modified. Just because what you say is not irrelevant... but you walked around it...