Search results for query: *

@Rat Patrol....Now that I hacked your page, back to your original question!LOL I ran 11:98 @ 112 MPH @ sea Level (through mufflers), in my 71 Duster 3400 lbs wet with a 400 HP "engine" dyno'd 340 SB J heads massaged, don't remember the cam, but it was flat tapet.I want to say 290, but don't...

Got you,Cool, you had me worried, I thought I had at least a 1000 FW HP to be running the E.T. & MPH I run....LOL I think the 17% figure, is most likely for stick cars.Auto's are in the low to mid 20's and I would think loose converter auto cars like mine are in the 28-30%...But I am not...

If Wallace uses RW HP, then it is way off (which it hasn't been for me using FW HP), it says my car runs 10:01 @ 135 MPH, It runs 9:40 @ 142 MPH If you use robrobinette It says it runs 9:72,by plugging in FW HP, if you plug in RW HP, it then says 10:01 Just sayin' I am using real world E.T. &...

I like Wallace, lots of different calculators too.

Thanks, but you can take away the E.T. plug in weight and MPH, it still comes out at RW HP times 28% for real world FW HP Funny, I have friends in Australia, they only talk MPH, they don' care at all about E.T., MPH speaks volumes of HP to them, so you are not alone. :eye:

^^^^^^ Agree with him I am a die hard drag racer, I don't go for the number's either.I build a new car, and take what it gives me, then fine tune it from there for constancy. I don't care what E.T. or MPH it's going to run, all though I pretty much know what it is going to run when I build it...