That’s incorrectNo, he asked about a stock 318. You did not.
That’s incorrectNo, he asked about a stock 318. You did not.
Well I went back and read and I still don't see where the OP talked about adding headers and a four barrel. Maybe I'm lookin with the wrong eye.
Finally got to my designation. I have a LD4B, 600 edelbrock and 340 manifolds all in the works. I have a 3.23 gear with 255-15 rear tires.
I could use a 3:55 at least with that tall tire. I don't need a tire fryer.Pretty tall tire. Probably better remain conservative on the cam choice. The 265 DEH Comp would be a good choice and about as large as I would recommend. I love the split pattern and the pretty big split between intake and exhaust duration. That will help it out with manifolds.
I could use a 3:55 at least with that tall tire. I don't need a tire fryer.
I might just put the intake/carb and the manifolds/duals and call it quits for now. I seem to have a need to change the cam too. LolFinally got to my designation. I have a LD4B, 600 edelbrock and 340 manifolds all in the works. I have a 3.23 gear with 255-15 rear tires. Stock converter.
I might just put the intake/carb and the manifolds/duals and call it quits for now. I seem to have a need to change the cam too. Lol
My 600 eddy was lean, even with the stock manifolds... just say'n
Rusty, it is toolmans first post, post #1 where he wrote in the Parameters of 4bbl, 650, etc...
No worries ether way.
I have the 1405 manual choke. I fixed the problem, though. All I did was install a pieced together 670 Holley Street AvengerWell, that's what it's designed for, if it's a 1406. They are the economy AFB. The 1405 is the performance version.
No worries, I appreciate your input and enjoy the conversation. You guys have lots of years of experience.Ok, cool thanks. You know I'm half fuckin blind. LOL
255-60/15's are 27" tallOn the 255-15 tire: what's the ratio? Someone mentioned they are tall? Didn't see it mentioned.
Are they 55? 60? 70? Just curious and interested for a future project.
I was thking the same. For a couple extra horsepower it's probably not worth the extra strain on the vave train with those agressive ramps.That's a pretty fast ramp cam from howards. For as little as you may see in performance, on a driver deal, I'd go with something more conservative since this isn't an all out deal.
Yea only limited highway blasts for this ride.When I had the 67 together I had Ford 3.7X rear with the tallest rear tires I could get under there. Loved em. Don't do "high miles" cruising
I need to run that one on the dyno. A little extra power is hard to justify the extra cost.After a lot of research: Countless simulations and talking to a ton of people, I found this:
High Efficiency Retro-Fit Hydraulic Roller Cam - Chrysler 273-360 272/272 - Lunati Power