B3422w5
Well-Known Member
I’ll quit before I go that slow. Talking about the way others choose to race. Good luck going slow. Probably another one I should add to my short list. Lol
Arrogant much?
I’ll quit before I go that slow. Talking about the way others choose to race. Good luck going slow. Probably another one I should add to my short list. Lol
I have gone as slow as 22.8 in the 1/4 mile and as quick/fast as 9.20 and about 145 mph.I’ll quit before I go that slow.
Too much…..Arrogant much?
If you are happy and having a good time let the crippled enjoy their crutches.I have gone as slow as 22.8 in the 1/4 mile and as quick/fast as 9.20 and about 145 mph.
I don't think I could do it now (under the same rules/equipment as in the 70's) But at one meet I ran my Z/sa valiant (16.75) in "street" bracket, and the Dragster (9.5) in super pro (no box) and won both.
But you run the equipment you want, and I'll stay "old school", and we can both enjoy ourselves.
PS: I was just busting chops. I thought I would get more of a reaction.
The reason I posted that info on myself, was just to supply some background, to show I'm not just a online racer. Now I am just an occasional racer. Age, finances and family health issues have put a crimp in my racing.
I DONT HAVE ONE , BUT A TRANSBRAKE AND ALL THE FOOLPROOF ELECTRONICS ARE 2 DIFF. THINGS ,,,excuse the caps...A transbrake is just too dangerous for them.
Exactly. I remember the days when you went to the track on race day and could get almost as many time shots you wanted before eliminations. Gates opened at about 8 am, hot track about 9 am, eliminations about 1 or 2 pm, finish racing about mid night. You could actually work on the tune up on race day, or even try some different parts to test back to back.
my opinion > its easier to win in a slow car that is consistant , than one that always was traction limited...where everything had to be just right , including track prep (back in the old days ...Arrogant much?
Yes, I understand that. It looks totally stupid to someone that is not really familiar with drag racing. And the drivers are not really driving, they are just steering, the "computer" is doing the driving. Take the computer out of the car and show me what the driver can do.
PS: over the years I have competed in quite a few different vehicles. From a Z/SA- bracket racer 65 Valiant, a 65 Valiant with a 273, a altered wheelbase 68 Cougar with a 440 Chrys., Front motor dragster with SBC. I ran all four of those cars at 5 different races in the same week. ET's ranged from high 16's to mid 9's and I did well. I have held record's in three different stock eliminator classes with a Ford, a Chevy and a Mopar. I was runnerup at the "bracket Nationals" at Byron Ill. in 1976, also runnerup at the division one Bracket finals. Over the years I have raced at over 50 different dragstrips (even ran at Pittsburg) and I can't even say how many cars. And I never ran electronics, except for ign box. Fact is I never even had a "line lock" until 5 years ago. Back "in the day" I was very good, But I parked my car in 1985, because footbrake and box cars ran together, and foot breakers did not have a very good chance of making it to the "money" rounds at a big payout race. I resurrected slant six my car in 2000 to run the slant six series. I'm not so good any more, as I don't run my races or TnT's, and I have slowed down some at 82 years old.
my opinion > its easier to win in a slow car that is consistant , than one that always was traction limited...where everything had to be just right , including track prep (back in the old days ...
View attachment 1716306688
I agree. I was almost always at a disadvantage, as I was usually the slowest car, when racing in "all run" races. Plus it gets hairy when you are doing 16-17 sec, and the other car is at least a 11 sec car. I always worried about the closing car having a problem and coming into my lane at the top end.One new rule I do like is the TRU- START that has been implemented at many tracks.
Where who has the worst red light loses, instead of who has the first one loses.
It tilts the playing field more away from wallet/ speed.
he has lost touch of it all.He actually hasn’t lost touch at all. He just fondly remembers a bygone era of racing that in many ways was much more pure than it is today.
I love footbrake racing too. It’s all I do. And I take great pleasure taking down higher tech opponents.
But, each to his own. Things evolve. It’s just nice that in spite of that, you can race how you want.
My friend Donnie Hagar won the million last year off the bottom, imagine winning it off the foot!
keyboard heroI do and I do it for probably less money in my complete car than most box racers have in their boxes.
I will challenge anyone on this site (within a reasonable traveling distance) to run against me in a car they have no more than $3000 into. That's what I have in mine. Not everyone has a ton of money for racing.
Yep.keyboard hero
keyboard hero
Wow !! with all the negativity this forum is getting to be like Moparts.com. There is nothing wrong with racing a "slow " car although my 11 second Dart is my primary race vehicle , my " slow " 15 second pickup actually has a better winning record. I race in two classes with my Dart that trans brakes are allowed in and I have been pretty successful foot braking against them with my 60 ft. times and reaction times being similar or better most of the time. I have resisted going to a trans brake although I only leave at 2,000 rpm I worry about rear and trans breakage in my 904 and 8 3/4 . Several friends have suggested going to a " glide " but the cost would be high and too much of my combo would have to change. I like my 904 its been in the car for 7 years with 0 problems.Five guys on my ignore list and 3 of them posted on this post. Some minds think alike. Lol
Wow !! with all the negativity this forum is getting to be like Moparts.com. There is nothing wrong with racing a "slow " car although my 11 second Dart is my primary race vehicle , my " slow " 15 second pickup actually has a better winning record. I race in two classes with my Dart that trans brakes are allowed in and I have been pretty successful foot braking against them with my 60 ft. times and reaction times being similar or better most of the time. I have resisted going to a trans brake although I only leave at 2,000 rpm I worry about rear and trans breakage in my 904 and 8 3/4 . Several friends have suggested going to a " glide " but the cost would be high and too much of my combo would have to change. I like my 904 its been in the car for 7 years with 0 problems.
View attachment 1716306899
View attachment 1716306904
Unfortunately I started this thread. I didn't mean to start this debate. I don't Footbrake the AMX because it's so cramped.
Lots of big dollar Footbrake racing here in the southeast. I mean real Footbrake racing. Footbrake racing down here is with no transbrake's and no staging or starting line in hancer's.
The main reason I race what we call super pro , that it pays more.
At our local tracks on a weekly basis super pro will have 60 to 75 cars and it pays $2000. Pro " Footbrake " will have 40 to 50 cars and pays $1000.
I have lots of friends that only run Footbrake and their cars run mid 5's in the 8th.
I will probably Footbrake and Box race my Dakota when it's finished. But people should run whichever they prefer. But don't knock the other class.
There's another difference for me: I'm not trying to make $$ at this. I would be one HUNGRY dude if I was!! I race simply for the thrill of competition. Trying to cut a light and then fender racing at the 1/4 mile stripe...loads of fun to me. And if I win some $$ then it's a great bonus. I don't clamor for those big payout races as they attract too many sharks!!
In the racing 1.0 version of me back in the 80's and early 90's, I won about $1200 the last year I raced. Good times as several trips to the finals!!
Speaking of BIG BUCK BRAKET RACES. Trying to get ready for this one. In Montgomery, Al
View attachment 1716307305