Front End Alignment

-

John Cailey

Crizila
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Messages
279
Reaction score
169
Location
Payson, Az
Looking to do a front end alignment using your magnetic caster / camber gauge with aluminum wheels? Making this simple 1/16" steel plate to bolt to your American torque thrust wheel centers will solve your problem.
alignment1.jpg
alignment2.jpg
alignment3.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That IS a good idea!! You would want to check, tho and see what the runout is on that surface on the wheel
 
Surface of the WHEEL. Should get you to the alignment shop.
How do you think alignment shops do it?? They align off the wheel, whether it be a string machine or a beam machine, they align off the wheel ( usually the rim lip area). Actually not as accurate as the area I am using. The area I am using is machined, as is the wheel area that is bolted to the hub or drum. Like all aluminum wheels, all machined surfaces are done in the same plane ( parallel to one another ). If all the surface areas I mentioned are clean and the wheel is not bent, the alignment will be on the $. Trust me, I used to do this for a living. :popcorn:
 
How do you think alignment shops do it?? They align off the wheel, whether it be a string machine or a beam machine, they align off the wheel ( usually the rim lip area). Actually not as accurate as the area I am using. The area I am using is machined, as is the wheel area that is bolted to the hub or drum. Like all aluminum wheels, all machined surfaces are done in the same plane ( parallel to one another ). If all the surface areas I mentioned are clean and the wheel is not bent, the alignment will be on the $. Trust me, I used to do this for a living. :popcorn:
I think the MODERN alignment shops use equipment with electrical sensors to compensate for any wheel run-out, along with a lot of other things we can not measure without sensors and computers. Seeing you are only doing a two wheel alignment, the little bit of compensation run-out you may experience with your set-up is moot compared to not measuring thrust ,off-set and set-back.
I'm curios about your toe measuring methods and do you have a method for predicting set-back?
 
I think the MODERN alignment shops use equipment with electrical sensors to compensate for any wheel run-out, along with a lot of other things we can not measure without sensors and computers. Seeing you are only doing a two wheel alignment, the little bit of compensation run-out you may experience with your set-up is moot compared to not measuring thrust ,off-set and set-back.
I'm curios about your toe measuring methods and do you have a method for predicting set-back?
Assume this is a test?, but without getting in to a pissing match, let me say that wheel alignments are only as good as the person doing them, whether you are doing it at home with a few $100 dollars worth of equipment or modern alignment shops using $100k worth of equipment. I found this out the hard way with my race car. I now do ALL my own alignments. Just about anything you can measure with a sensor / computer, you can also measure ( and compensate for - if you are inclined to fix it properly ) mechanically. This includes wheel run out, off-set, set back, SAI. Once you have made your rear axle measurements ( no off-set or set back ), a 4 wheel alignment is pretty much a moog point - no need to measure off of something that you already know is sitting in there straight. A 2 wheel alignment will work just fine. Attached pic is of my toe gauge. I usually shoot for 1/16" in for the street. Race car = 0.
toe1.jpg
toe2.jpg
toe2.jpg
 
Assume this is a test?, but without getting in to a pissing match, let me say that wheel alignments are only as good as the person doing them, whether you are doing it at home with a few $100 dollars worth of equipment or modern alignment shops using $100k worth of equipment. I found this out the hard way with my race car. I now do ALL my own alignments. Just about anything you can measure with a sensor / computer, you can also measure ( and compensate for - if you are inclined to fix it properly ) mechanically. This includes wheel run out, off-set, set back, SAI. Once you have made your rear axle measurements ( no off-set or set back ), a 4 wheel alignment is pretty much a moog point - no need to measure off of something that you already know is sitting in there straight. A 2 wheel alignment will work just fine. Attached pic is of my toe gauge. I usually shoot for 1/16" in for the street. Race car = 0. View attachment 1715048481 View attachment 1715048482 View attachment 1715048482
I also use this same gauge for checking WB side to side by adding a section of square tubing in the middle.

WB checker.jpg
 
Hey John, thanks for the response. I'm not looking for a pissing match either.
I cut my teeth on a A-111 so I'm not up to speed on mechanical methods. Lasers and computers do it for me.
I'm just fishing for info and you seem to be a good reference.
I get it as far as setting up the rear square to start with and measuring wheel base.

I just don't get how you can compete with a computer and all that trigonometry and still do as good of a job.
Yes, I'm sure your alignments get the job done and tire wear is fine if not better than someone with less knowledge and a brand new computer aligner, especially with modified ride heights.

But there is always going to be some setback and I cant understand how you can keep from setting the front toe equal to setback without a computer.
 
Hey John, thanks for the response. I'm not looking for a pissing match either.
I cut my teeth on a A-111 so I'm not up to speed on mechanical methods. Lasers and computers do it for me.
I'm just fishing for info and you seem to be a good reference.
I get it as far as setting up the rear square to start with and measuring wheel base.

I just don't get how you can compete with a computer and all that trigonometry and still do as good of a job.
Yes, I'm sure your alignments get the job done and tire wear is fine if not better than someone with less knowledge and a brand new computer aligner, especially with modified ride heights.

But there is always going to be some setback and I cant understand how you can keep from setting the front toe equal to setback without a computer.
Hey Bodyperson, Wow, We had an A-111 in my shop for many years ( think it was a string machine ) before finally upgrading to an all computerized machine. I've been retired for over 15 years, but I think we went to a Bear machine from the Snap-on unit. You are right about my not being able to compete with the new stuff. For one, you don't even need a level surface to do it anymore. Computer figures that out for you automatically. For sure faster with a lot more info right at your fingertips. No doubt the computerized stuff is more accurate IF the operator knows what he is doing, not cutting corners ( "set the toe and go"), punches in the correct parameters, and has periodically maintained the equipment he is using. I just feel more comfortable doing it myself, and I feel I can get pretty close on the accuracy thing - not having to book any hours. :steering:
 
Hey Bodyperson, Wow, We had an A-111 in my shop for many years ( think it was a string machine ) before finally upgrading to an all computerized machine. I've been retired for over 15 years, but I think we went to a Bear machine from the Snap-on unit. You are right about my not being able to compete with the new stuff. For one, you don't even need a level surface to do it anymore. Computer figures that out for you automatically. For sure faster with a lot more info right at your fingertips. No doubt the computerized stuff is more accurate IF the operator knows what he is doing, not cutting corners ( "set the toe and go"), punches in the correct parameters, and has periodically maintained the equipment he is using. I just feel more comfortable doing it myself, and I feel I can get pretty close on the accuracy thing - not having to book any hours. :steering:
Ya it was the string machine by hunter. 30 years ago it was state of the art. That Lee Hunter guy was a smart fellow.
I want to invest in some alignment equipment but not sure what route to take.
 
Ya it was the string machine by hunter. 30 years ago it was state of the art. That Lee Hunter guy was a smart fellow.
I want to invest in some alignment equipment but not sure what route to take.
Ya, have no idea why I said Snap-on???:realcrazy: Actually had a Hunter rack to go with it - and extra strings of course.
 
Ya, have no idea why I said Snap-on???:realcrazy: Actually had a Hunter rack to go with it - and extra strings of course.
Those Hunter racks are nice with air bag lift and the swing jacks. Those racks were made for production.
 
Those Hunter racks are nice with air bag lift and the swing jacks. Those racks were made for production.
Yep. At the time ( about 84 - 85 ) I was running a 17 bay Government shop in the Chicago area. Many a squad car went on and off that rack. If there was a draw-back to it, you had to have a dedicated bay for it. We did do some brake work on it also. Later stuff ( all electronic and computerized ) was much more portable.
 
I've been driving around for a couple of years now with my own alignment done with my iPhone.
For toe-in I'm using an even older toe-gauge bar;

IMG_0595.jpg


IMG_0598.jpg
 
Ya it was the string machine by hunter. 30 years ago it was state of the art. That Lee Hunter guy was a smart fellow.
I want to invest in some alignment equipment but not sure what route to take.
Ya, obviously we can't afford what our shops had - nor would you want to for home use. I like my magnetic "Deco" caster / camber gauge, but it has some short comings - which perpetrated this thread. My turn tables are "Rand" units that I bought on E-bag. Heavy duty quality ball bearing units for a great price. There are more toe gauges out there than you and I have toes. A good quality tape measure can fill most of the other bills. It's time consuming work to do it at home, but at least you know it's right, and you can play with settings all you want. I know for a fact that my street rod diff is off side to side about 3/8". Not gonna worry about it for that amount, as I would have to relocate all 4 link perches on the housing to correct it. Set back is on the $. I started out with 3* of caster and I didn't like the poor wheel return on corners. Upped it to 6* and the wheel returns real nice with no noticeable increase in steering effort. All stuff you can do without a major tool investment.
 
-
Back
Top