The middle of the road 6.4/392 is a great package.
We own a standard 2015 5.7 R/T and while it is a great car, the added power and brakes of the 392 cars would have been a better choice.
I happen to agree with you. In fact, I have stated it here before. Don't get me wrong, I bleed Mopar. I have had dozens of Mopars over the years. I have owned my 69 340 Barracuda for over 30 years. I DO like the new challengers, but I like the looks of the Mustang GT a little better, and I think it is a better value dollar for dollar. If I was going to purchase a modern performance car, It would be a Mustang GT.I went down a similar road a few months back and ended up here. For the same money as 50-70,000 miled out 2012-2014 srt 8’s I got a fully loaded 2022 mustang GT (premium package, gt performance package, magnaride suspension, exhaust cutouts, brembo’s). With remaining factory warranty and only 6,800 miles on it.
I’m a mopar fanatic but think the Mustang is a better value for the money and has a lot more refinement in its design, interior, and driveability. Absolutely a better handling car, it’s faster, just by the weight difference alone (about 700 pounds lighter)
I’ll probably get crucified for this but I don’t care. It’s an awesome car and I think you should add this to your search.
I don’t think anyone needs a supercharged 800+ horse car for the street. 460 ish is PLENTY. These things are quick out of the box. Blows the doors off my old road runner, AND I can also cruise it at 60mph and get over 30 miles per gallon!
View attachment 1716245319
Ok..got to chime in here. We have 2017 Challenger Scat Pack. In response to previous posts about a Mustang being faster is...well..incorrect. Faster than a 5.7 R/T yes but, my wife and I both have had Mustangs roll up on us while in the Challenger and, it's really no competition to drive out of thier life. The Mustang is smaller and will handle better because it was designed for that. They are designed to be a " Track" car, the Challenger is not. The Challenger is a muscle car and makes no apologies for it. The Challenger was designed to be comfortable and go fast in a straight line, not do road course stuff. The Challenger looks better, sounds better and, has more room. I would hands down buy our Challenger over and over every day of the week!!View attachment 1716246036
The Challenger is expensive because they are cool..lol. and, they are dead now so, the value comment only works if your buying. The real value comes when you decide to cut it lose. I can sell my Challenger for more money now than what I paid for it in 2019 when we bought it with only 3400 miles on it. It has 44,000 on it now. I can say the only thing (besides my 71 Challenger) that has drove out of my life in this car was a Track Hawk. My wife was driving and came home saying she NEEDED a Hellcat...lolYou have a very nice car! Guaranteed it would not drive out my life they are closely matched, in fact on paper equals 1/4 mile et’s. The older SRT’s are slower than yours. The 17’ you have would be a close race to mine car. Looks are subjective. The challenger is nice, I’ve driven them, but the Mustang a better all around car especially when Overall Value is considered and without that massive blind spot over your shoulder..
The challengers have become stupid expensive for no real reason. It’s just a portly dodge after all.
The Challenger is expensive because they are cool..lol. and, they are dead now so, the value comment only works if your buying. The real value comes when you decide to cut it lose. I can sell my Challenger for more money now than what I paid for it in 2019 when we bought it with only 3400 miles on it. It has 44,000 on it now.
I sold a 70 440 six pack Challenger in 2012 and bought an SRT 392 Challenger with the 6 speed manual. Although it was a nice car I realized I actually HATED IT. I woke up and realized "I'M AN OLD CAR GUY" Computerized , ABS , Traction Control , blah blah blah Just didn't thrill me like I thought it would. I traded it in on a new truck and bought a 71 Cuda 383 I haven't looked back with ANY regrets. Not to mention I never lose money on old cars The newer cars nose dive in value every day.
View attachment 1716247121
View attachment 1716247125
This...up above...I couldn't agree with this more...HELL, YES!
The newer vehicles just don't have a "soul". Sure, they're reliable, quiet, comfortable, and fuel efficient (relatively speaking), but they're BORING! Imagine being at a party and having a choice at who to talk with: "Person A", who's been around the the world and has all sorts of interesting stories and experiences, or "Person B", who watches TV all day and wants to talk about Judge Judy.
I would equate driving a new car versus and old car like this. Some guys ride Harley's and other prefer Gold Wings. Although they both "look" like motorcycles. One is ALIVE AND HAS SOUL the other is as LIFELESS AS A SEWING MACHINE (LOL) If you've ever rode both "You Know" All I'm saying is for me "I Know" and it's the old car everytime.
I get ya there...I either hop in my 512 71 Challenger that will eat our newer Challengers lunch or just cruise in my 360 Duster..(it is not eating anybodies lunch...lol)This is the whole reason for my post. It was because of price and the OP said he wants one ‘without a second mortgage’ etc lol. I may well have bought one too (SRT) but I just couldn’t justify it as, again, I’d have to get one substantially older with many more miles on it for the same money…. It just makes more "cents" for me to get a much newer gt with warranty and only 6k miles on it instead.
I have a complete set of winter ice radials on aluminum rims for it and winter drive it! lol. It’s just a car to me.
If I want to go fast or get my mopar fix I just hop in the 402 powered duster which is quicker than the Mustang and the SRT….
View attachment 1716246683