New Mancini Timing Cover Fitment Issue

-
I would just eliminate that seal and use silicone to seal it.

Some of the most expensive oil pans I’ve bought don’t use those end seals.

I run a crank scraper so I don’t even use pan gaskets. It doesn’t leak but I can’t remember if I use end seals or not.

Either way I wouldn’t care about using the end seal.
 
You sure you don’t have the rear pan seal for a 360? 318 and 340 have the the same size front and rear but the 360 is the same as the 318 in the front but the rear seal is smaller. Any way your seal is the wrong one.
 
Assuming the 1832 is 183.2mm and the 2153 is 215.3mm, that would be 7.21" and 8.48" respectively. That is a 1.27" difference on just that one measurement. I would get a refund from Mancini and buy a good used one.
 
harrisonm said:
Assuming the 1832 is 183.2mm and the 2153 is 215.3mm, that would be 7.21" and 8.48" respectively. That is a 1.27" difference on just that one measurement. I would get a refund from Mancini and buy a good used one.
Click to expand...
I'm thinking it wasn't zeroed out. Look closely at the scale. The Mancini one looks to be close to 150mm, whereas the original looks to be maybe 146mm. Not sure what's up with the LCD display.

1715569040141.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top