Torker II intake vs Performer RPM

-
I

IQ52

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2011
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
3,076
Location
Idaho
505 stroker with Edelbrock Torker II and then made a change to an Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. Then Torker II w/ 2" spacer.

RPM...............TQ/HP.................TQ/HP..................TQ/HP

3200............548/334...............600/366...............534/325
3400............594/384...............616/399...............585/379
3600............598/410...............630/432...............597/409
3800............599/433...............627/454...............599/433
4000............600/457...............621/473...............609/464
4200............600/480...............612/490...............608/486
4400............600/503...............599/502...............610/511
4600............611/535...............603/528...............613/537
4800............613/561...............609/556...............619/565
5000............619/589...............608/579...............621/591
5200............614/607...............611/605...............617/611
5400............601/618...............603/620...............613/630
5600............591/630...............591/630...............595/635
5800............575/634...............567/626...............578/638
6000............560/639...............546/624...............572/654
6100............550/639...............534/621...............566/657
 
IQ52 said:
505 stroker with Edelbrock Torker II and then made a change to an Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. Then Torker II w/ 2" spacer.

RPM...............TQ/HP.................TQ/HP..................TQ/HP

3200............548/334...............600/366...............534/325
3400............594/384...............616/399...............585/379
3600............598/410...............630/432...............597/409
3800............599/433...............627/454...............599/433
4000............600/457...............621/473...............609/464
4200............600/480...............612/490...............608/486
4400............600/503...............599/502...............610/511
4600............611/535...............603/528...............613/537
4800............613/561...............609/556...............619/565
5000............619/589...............608/579...............621/591
5200............614/607...............611/605...............617/611
5400............601/618...............603/620...............613/630
5600............591/630...............591/630...............595/635
5800............575/634...............567/626...............578/638
6000............560/639...............546/624...............572/654
6100............550/639...............534/621...............566/657
Click to expand...
guess that `s why they call it a tweener manifold. might as well run a victor (as far as carb heighth) by the time you run a spacer. would be interested in what a victor would compare on the exact same set-up. good stuff! thanks for the info!---bob
 
famous bob said:
guess that `s why they call it a tweener manifold. might as well run a victor (as far as carb heighth) by the time you run a spacer. would be interested in what a victor would compare on the exact same set-up. good stuff! thanks for the info!---bob
Click to expand...

Should time permit, I have the ported RPM, ported Torker II, ported Torker II w/spacer, OOTB Victor, OOTB Victor w/spacer, plenum blended Victor, plenum blended Victor w/spacer, plenum ported Victor and plenum ported Victor w/spacer. All this on a pump gas 496.
 
IQ52 said:
Should time permit, I have the ported RPM, ported Torker II, ported Torker II w/spacer, OOTB Victor, OOTB Victor w/spacer, plenum blended Victor, plenum blended Victor w/spacer, plenum ported Victor and plenum ported Victor w/spacer. All this on a pump gas 496.
Click to expand...


I LOVE all the numbers and info you post. It's super helpful to people like me that have an idea what I want but am not sure how to achieve that goal. Keep it coming!
 
Kind of surprised to see the drop in HP at lower RPMs with the 2 inch spacer. I'm using the Torker II myself though I wouldn't mind seeing you try the Holley Street dominator if you happen across one.

Anyway, thank you for all the data you provide, I follow your builds closely.
 
My experience with 440's has been the perf rpm likes a 1" spacer. Mine made 10more hp and 12 more ft/lbs after install. It was a hvh sis spacer. On my current 440 it seemed to help the mid and top end and pulls to red line smoother and quicker.
 
I am building a new 440 for the street and the Performer RPM is in my plans, I want the motor/power peaked at around 5,000-5,500 ish. I have a 1 inch spacer and can never remember which to use with a dual plane, 4 hole or single hole, think mine is a 4 hole so will try it with the spacer then. Will be selling my Weiand Team G as soon as I get the new RPM in my hands.
http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/attachment.php?attachmentid=1714751103&stc=1&d=1409623800
 

Attachments

  • i12071[1].jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 1,213
the67fish said:
I am building a new 440 for the street and the Performer RPM is in my plans, I want the motor/power peaked at around 5,000-5,500 ish. I have a 1 inch spacer and can never remember which to use with a dual plane, 4 hole or single hole, think mine is a 4 hole so will try it with the spacer then. Will be selling my Weiand Team G as soon as I get the new RPM in my hands.
http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/attachment.php?attachmentid=1714751103&stc=1&d=1409623800
Click to expand...

The one I used with success was a 4 hole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top