chryslerfat
Well-Known Member
This thread started before most members did.
2 bucks says it a transposed misprint. 1.78-1.87...? Find a part number for a 1.87 intake in 1967 or a D/Dart spec sheet that calls out the larger D/Dart valve, that is kinda major for a stock class. Misprints happen, especially in Mopar lore....and according to Galen's book, the valves on the 920 heads w/C.A.P. are 1.87 x 1.50's...
Since Chrysler built 50 cars to compete in D/Stock, all engines would have to be the same. Since the car's were being built and sold around the country, even California, the engines would all have to be w/C.A.P. The C.A.P. engines could have had larger 1.87 valves to meet California emission standards if they had them back then. Standard replacement valves went up to +0.030 or 1.081.2 bucks says it a transposed misprint. 1.78-1.87...? Find a part number for a 1.87 intake in 1967 or a D/Dart spec sheet that calls out the larger D/Dart valve, that is kinda major for a stock class. Misprints happen, especially in Mopar lore.
Thanks for clearing that up.Yes, they all had to be the same and no, the C.A.P did not have larger valves. The D/Dart build up pamphlet did say you could use larger valves but when you got 'em, they were 1.78.
View attachment 1715198733
View attachment 1715198732
http://www.seriousviewers.com/d-dart/Technical Service Bulletin.pdf
anyone know the differences of a standard 273 head 2536178 (66) and 273 commando heads 2658920
Agreed!Bottom line in a given year both the Commando and the standard 273 used the same heads.
Alan
What version of book do you have? May be it has been corrected in the newer books.1.1.78 or 1.87. Whatever! Enjoyed going back and forth with you on this pishta. I use to get into it with Paul Ceasrine on D/Dart stuff.
Just think, I have the original docs that appear in your last post. Got them with the latest D/Dart. I misread the o/s valve size in the 1966 parts book. It was +0.030 dia stem.
Got a call into Galen to see if he transposed the 1.78 and 1.87 in his casting book. I'll update you when I find out.
I see no indication of that in the 66 or 67 Factory parts book.The only difference is valve springs.
I would say those are in there own world and not the same as a Commando 273.Cuda Al -- the D/Dart valve spring number is 2843922 and they cost $1.66 each.
TMM -- I have the 6th printing of the part &casting number book dated Jan, 1996.
I will have to look through my books. I think I have 2diffferent printings.
TMM -- I have the 6th printing of the part &casting number book dated Jan, 1996.
Like finding a needle in a haystack but I will look for this info as well.I thought I remember reading they used some slightly larger 392 Hemi valves.
My #920's are 1.78 dia. intakes.TMM -- I have the 6th printing of the part &casting number book dated Jan, 1996.
pishta -- 1.563 is a winner. I could buy my old/first D/Dart engine back for 5k and measure the valves but I'm going to pass on that. I'm curious about the so-called free flowing intake. Pretty sure the 4 throttle bore holes were left as machined for the CAP engine because of the casting number and NHRA. The Carb Flange (2863052) had the larger 1 11/16 holes in it for the Holley carb.
Cuda Al -- the D/Dart valve spring number is 2843922 and they cost $1.66 each.
I see no indication of that in the 66 or 67 Factory parts book.
Alan
That may be true but that isn't a factory parts book and may not reflect actual production.From the Blueprint specs in the Chrysler Racing Manual, Valve Springs
Load Closed Height Closed Load Open Height Open
273-2 bbl 74 1.62 150 1.31
273-4 bbl 103 1.62 184 1.31
That may be true but that isn't a factory parts book and may not reflect actual production.
There are an endless availability of aftermarket springs, Mopar Performance or other.
Show me Chrysler literature from 64-67 showing this information.
Alan