I will look them up in a bit when I get back in the house.I have this set of pistons and rods. Seven of the rods are 2406782 and one is 1618699. Can anyone tell me what the two different rods are original to - 273, 318, years? Any information is appreciated. Thanks
View attachment 1716167576
View attachment 1716167577
View attachment 1716167581
View attachment 1716167582
I have this set of pistons and rods. Seven of the rods are 2406782 and one is 1618699. Can anyone tell me what the two different rods are original to - 273, 318, years? Any information is appreciated. Thanks
View attachment 1716167576
View attachment 1716167577
View attachment 1716167581
View attachment 1716167582
One is a part number and one is a casting number.The 699 casting is the later, larger 318, 340 and 360 size rod. You can see the size difference.
Right. I gave the number so he would know which one. It's very obviously larger than the rest.One is a part number and one is a casting number.
699 is the casting number for a 64-71 318 and 64-69 273. Same rod. No 340 or 360 rod here.The 699 casting is the later, larger 318, 340 and 360 size rod. You can see the size difference.
Then your information is not correct. brb. I'll show you.699 is the casting number for a 64-71 318 and 64-69 273. Same rod. No 340 or 360 rod here.
Different angle dummy! Same rod, one is a casting number and one is a part number. You are just looking at a photo of different angles.Look at the red lines I put in the picture. Look at the big end. Look how much more room the top rod has compared to the second one. That rod has a LOT more meat there. Look at the red lines going up both rods. Look how much wider that top rod is compared to the others. It's very obviously a different rod.
View attachment 1716167756
I'm not a dummy. It's a different rod.Different angle dummy! Same rod, one is a casting number and one is a part number.
Probably TRW's (their number anyway. Egge uses the same number) I was never a fan of that centering hole on those but it must not have been an issue.No idea on rods lol, but those look like replacement commando pistons.
That got me thinking. I found my photo. There are there just a lot smaller.I believe that the old school TRW pistons used the centering hole. The pistons I've seen from Egge didn't have it, I could be wrong.
Ah, no mistake. I couldn't remember the center either until I found my old photo.You are right TMM, my mistake.