I have a pair of 315 heads with the 66 up intake bolt pattern also. If it has 3/8 intake bolts with 9/16 wrench heads, don't sweat it. They appear to be closed chambered heads, that should match with the 920 head.
That's odd. They must have been late cast and machined for the "newer" 66 style. Never say never with Mopar.I have a pair of 315 heads with the 66 up intake bolt pattern also. If it has 3/8 intake bolts with 9/16 wrench heads, don't sweat it. They appear to be closed chambered heads, that should match with the 920 head.
Yup, I've had a pair of 315 casting heads with the later 3/8 intake bolts too.....and believe it or not, a pair of 920's with the 5/16 intake bolts! The combustion chambers are the same size, so, in that respect, there would be no problem running one with the other. It's just what did they do to make the later Edelbrock intake work. It's the intake bolt size and bolt angle that are different. The angle hitting the head and block are the same. Any time you use those 315 castings, (or other casting too) you should mag them for cracks. The 315's mainly had a crack problem on the outside flat surface between the spark plugs.I have a pair of 315 heads with the 66 up intake bolt pattern also. If it has 3/8 intake bolts with 9/16 wrench heads, don't sweat it. They appear to be closed chambered heads, that should match with the 920 head.
Crazy stuff for sure.Yup, I've had a pair of 315 casting heads with the later 3/8 intake bolts too.....and believe it or not, a pair of 920's with the 5/16 intake bolts! The combustion chambers are the same size, so, in that respect, there would be no problem running one with the other. It's just what did they do to make the later Edelbrock intake work. It's the intake bolt size and bolt angle that are different. The angle hitting the head and block are the same. Any time you use those 315 castings, (or other casting too) you should mag them for cracks. The 315's mainly had a crack problem on the outside flat surface between the spark plugs.