junkyardhero
Well-Known Member
You'll have to pick on each other I'm out I have more important things to do.
you keep saying this, and... yet, here you are.
edit: read a bit more. see you did in fact see yourself out.
You'll have to pick on each other I'm out I have more important things to do.
He's gone for a bit now. I think @toolmanmike gave him a vacation. Maybe he will make it a stayawaycation. lolyou keep saying this, and... yet, here you are.
I did. For 2 weeks. He said some pretty nasty things to other members and then deleted his comments. I read those and we don't allow that kind of stuff here. I will give him a chance when he comes back . If he does it again, he will be gone permanently.He's gone for a bit now. I think @toolmanmike gave him a vacation. Maybe he will make it a stayawaycation. lol
Thank you kindly. He simply has nothing constructive to add as of late.I did. For 2 weeks. He said some pretty nasty things to other members and them deleted his comments. I read those and we don't allow that kind of stuff here. I will give him a chance when he comes back . If he does it again, he will be gone permanently.
I can read all your deleted posts. You have earned a vacation. See you in a couple weeks.
I'm no expert either but I would think the comp with the shorter advertised duration & narrower LSA would yield better cylinder pressure / dynamic compression all else being equal. Assuming both use the same lift point for advertised duration.I'm no expert, but to me looks like similar cams and output wouldn't be to far off from each other, the xe250h has a tighter lsa and faster ramps so probably a better under the curve performance,, but I'd imagine the differences wouldn't be overly huge. I'd would go with xe250h mainly cause of the 110 lsa. There basically similar to a stock 340 cam