cmorrow
Well-Known Member
Reading between the lines, I'd take a stock 727 over a stock 904....
Neither. Go with a GM 200R4 (2004R whichever you prefer to call it), lighter than both and you gain an overdrive gear so you can use 4.10 gears out back and not drive yourself insane while on the freeway. Plus the 200R4 is all hydralic! And yes this trannies can live behind high hp/TQ motors just fine.
If I had a 727 I would use it. Did anyone ever see a 904 behind a 426 hemi? Of course not, they are not strong enough STOCK! I know they wont fit. Why has Mopar not made them fit? Not as strong as a 727 Tq Flite. IMO the only weak assembly on the 727 is the sprang. Had a 727 behnd my 426 wedge, NEVER had a issue with it.
i have read a 727 is 35 lbs heavier
...and takes 15 - 20 more hp just to run it.
904 should be a big win win
Neither. Go with a GM 200R4 (2004R whichever you prefer to call it), lighter than both and you gain an overdrive gear so you can use 4.10 gears out back and not drive yourself insane while on the freeway. Plus the 200R4 is all hydralic! And yes this trannies can live behind high hp/TQ motors just fine.
But at a cost that might be detrimental to some. From the factory the 2004R was never put in any high horsepower/torque applications. Lot's of V6's and small block V8 smogger engines yes (my kids 442 is an example). Factory engineers a lot smarter than we give them credit for. Just my opinion.
didnt the grand national come with a 200?
But at a cost that might be detrimental to some. From the factory the 2004R was never put in any high horsepower/torque applications. Lot's of V6's and small block V8 smogger engines yes (my kids 442 is an example). Factory engineers a lot smarter than we give them credit for. Just my opinion.
didnt the grand national come with a 200?