BarracudaWild68
Well-Known Member
Are you saying that the 904 nor the 727 can handle 500 hp? What about the 2 bbl. 383?500 horse? No. About half that. Most small block 727s won't handle it either. And the two barrel 383 won't either.
Are you saying that the 904 nor the 727 can handle 500 hp? What about the 2 bbl. 383?500 horse? No. About half that. Most small block 727s won't handle it either. And the two barrel 383 won't either.
Are you saying that the 904 nor the 727 can handle 500 hp? What about the 2 bbl. 383?
They are pretty cool over there. I've had an opportunity to talk with, I think Dan, who is the Mopar Specialist. Very helpful, and straightforward people! Good DudesIronracer, sounds right. Of course, A & A has these transmissions that are built to withstand much more power than 500.
I fail to see how you could build a 727 to handle 1,000 horse and think that it's weakness is that it only hold 3 clutches. At much less power than that you should be using an aftermarket drum which in all probability will hold plenty of clutches. Add in the cost of that drum, and an aftermarket roller clutch, and good valve body plus labour, etc, you could easily be at or better than $2,000.00 imho.The 383 two barrel trans only has 3 frictions in the direct clutch; just like small block 727s; that's the weak point. All other bb trans had four direct frictions except the hemi; which had five. I build 727s with six direct frictions for over 1,000 horse all the time; and 904s with five (which is what it takes to handle 500 horse); red eagles of course.
Where did I miss quote you? I know about the spline angles. At 1,000 horse if it has aluminium, it will strip those splines regardless of spline angle. Not all had aluminum though, and I am just saying that if you are going to put any major power through a 727 and value your legs, you need an aftermarket drum, not a stock replacement. Good parts cost money.You just love to mis-quote me don't you Duane? And that's why they changed the angle of the splines.
We are having communication breakdown. What I meant to say using a bad combination of words, is that if a guy wanted to build a 727 say to handle 700 horse, and he already had a 383 3 clutch 727, I would not tell him not to use it. I would explain to him that the stock drum, regardless of it factory clutch count, should not be used for the intended application. By default every aftermarket performance drum is usually manufactured for an increased clutch count. It makes no sense for them to manufacture a high dollarThey're not my legs. Good parts do cost money; especially for a 904; because it needs a ton more of them than a 727. Mis-quote: "it's weakness is that it only hold 3 clutches"...there, for what good it'll do..
Not disagreeing with this post. I just think you should build the 727 according to the intended use. The engine does not have to make a lot of power to break the roller clutch. An argument could be made that a stock 904 roller clutch is better than a stock 727 as it is riveted to the case. Although I agree the 727 has more clutch surface than 904, 5 clutches at high line pressure is sufficient for most performance applications using the 904.Jeeze, who said not to use it? The point is; a basically stock 727 with a stock rebuild is stronger than a $1500 904. I know you guys have been pushing the 904 for years, and builders are making a ton of money off the special parts, but for 95% of the readers on here, a 727 is the only way to go. The problem is; folks are making their decision without even comparing a 727 clutch plate to a 904 plate. Just look at both rebuild kits and see the difference; that's about all it would take, but guys already have a 904, so they want to convince themselves not to cut a driveshaft and mess with different linkage. Lay a 904 friction on a 727 friction; then decide. Oh, and no more worries about cracked junk 904 converters.
Yes you can sometimes get away with less clutch if you raise the line pressure. Less clutches is less weight = faster carMy old 440 race duster ran 11.001. It had a 3 clutch front drum. The guy that built it way back in the late 70s said it has less rotating mass. Kim