flathead31coupe
Well-Known Member
Is there a factory carburetor spacer for the thermoquad
Watch your hood clearance! (posted from another thread)Is there a factory carburetor spacer for the thermoquad
Correct, BUT, make DANG SURE you get the correct gasket. A Quardajet gasket is NOT the same. They will cause a vacuum leak around the back of the secondaries.Spacer, no. But the correct gasket is already over 1/4 inch thick...
View attachment 1716305237
Thank youSome possibilities for the thick gasket:
- Base gasket (open): Chrysler 3879786, Fel-Pro 1902, 60273, McCord 66-0144, Victor-Reinz G14589 (G26662 for 1971-1972), Rol CM55011 (CM55256 for 1971-1972), Walker G897, Mahle/Clevite G14589.
Hmmm.....I think I got that. Engine runs good (idles with 11 A/F ratio) but has a large sucking sound that seems to be coming from the rear of my TQ. I spayed some water in the center area of the rear base and noticed a definite change in the idle. How would one recognize the difference between the 2 gaskets?Correct, BUT, make DANG SURE you get the correct gasket. A Quardajet gasket is NOT the same. They will cause a vacuum leak around the back of the secondaries.
No thin paper gasket. Just the thick insulator gasket.Hmmm.....I think I got that. Engine runs good (idles with 11 A/F ratio) but has a large sucking sound that seems to be coming from the rear of my TQ. I spayed some water in the center area of the rear base and noticed a definite change in the idle. How would one recognize the difference between the 2 gaskets?
Also, is there a paper gasket installed above and below the thick one?
Thanks for the illustration Rob. I figured something was going on. I always thought there was a thin gasket above and below since the original aluminum spacer had a gasket above and below.No thin paper gasket. Just the thick insulator gasket.
Thremoquad gasket. There is also an open hole version of the Thermoquad gasket, but as you can see, the Thermoquad gasket has a thicker back wall. Using the Queerdrajet gasket on the Thermoquad will result in a vacuum leak around the back of the secondaries. Most stores will try to sell you the wrong gasket, because they want to stock as few parts as possible.
View attachment 1716305455
Queerdrajet Gasket.
View attachment 1716305457
What "original" aluminum spacer was that?Thanks for the illustration Rob. I figured something was going on. I always thought there was a thin gasket above and below since the original aluminum spacer had a gasket above and below.
1971 only.Thanks for the illustration Rob. I figured something was going on. I always thought there was a thin gasket above and below since the original aluminum spacer had a gasket above and below.
Got a picture? I've never seen one. What was the purpose?1971 only.
I bought a repro. I think Mopar was just figuring things out. I'll see if I can find it. I vaguely remember it being correct. Two thin gaskets and a thin aluminum spacer in between. I had a "71" 340 four speed Duster for a while.Got a picture? I've never seen one. What was the purpose?
Yup, 1971 Demon.1971 only.
I'll get you a pic this afternoon.Got a picture? I've never seen one. What was the purpose?
Cool. I would like to see that. I wasn't aware the factory ever uses a spacer. What was its purpose?I'll get you a pic this afternoon.
Only guessing, space it up for correct choke operation or an attempt to insulate carb from intake heat? I remember pitching the cluge and just running the thick gasket. I did a lot of stupid stuff back then.Cool. I would like to see that. I wasn't aware the factory ever uses a spacer. What was its purpose?
The only reason I was thinking was maybe if they used some left over 70 intakes on the early 71 and used an adapter plate for the TQ. Evidently, that was not it.Only guessing, space it up for correct choke operation or an attempt to insulate carb from intake heat? I remember pitching the cluge and just running the thick gasket. I did a lot of stupid stuff back then.
No, it was the good, ...100 casting number, I still have it and the TQ. That combo was too good to let go.The only reason I was thinking was maybe if they used some left over 70 intakes on the early 71 and used an adapter plate for the TQ. Evidently, that was not it.
Yeah. My understanding is the 71 TQ was the best for all out power, but they kinda had trouble on the street. But I've never had one or worked on one.No, it was the good, ...100 casting number, I still have it and the TQ. That combo was too good to let go.
The gaskets above and below the spacer are quite substantial, Almost like something you'd see on a fibrous exhaust manifold gasket with metal impregnated.Only guessing, space it up for correct choke operation or an attempt to insulate carb from intake heat? I remember pitching the cluge and just running the thick gasket. I did a lot of stupid stuff back then.