Never seen all 8 before. And they came out of a 383 that was factory .020 overbore.
I’m guessing a 400 piston and rings with a taller compression height? I had a 1972 400 hp short block once that the pistons were just barely below deck, about.015 or so, so I’m thinking it was probably the same piston. I apologize for the de-rail, but folks I’ve talked to who have owned 400 HP that did the old school performance mods (TM6, headers, Crane Blazer 288/.480 cam, distributor recurve) claim it was more like a 340 than a big block. A whole of fun in a ‘72 charger with an automatic and 3.91 gears.Just a FYI, the factory 020 "440" is not 020 over, it is actually .022 over, which would be a bore of 4.342. Bore size look familiar? Yup, a standard 400 size.
I see Cleveland stuff. lolHave a 400 at the shop now that is also factory 020 over. It has 4 copper rods. Just a FYI, the factory 020 "440" is not 020 over, it is actually .022 over, which would be a bore of 4.342. Bore size look familiar? Yup, a standard 400 size. Anyway a few copper filled rods for comparison.
View attachment 1715863632 View attachment 1715863633 View attachment 1715863634
Never seen all 8 before. And they came out of a 383 that was factory .020 overbore. View attachment 1715863585
I’m all earsI would not use them.
I’m not being a smartass or looking to argue. Just want to do what’s best. I’m all ears. Building a 383 about 500Hp, A body, stick shift. ThanksI’m all ears
Low compression pistons. They were in a 67 440 that we’re about .080 in the hole. KimWhich 440 pistons will work in the 400? What compression height?
I’m all ears
Could be or they've been rebuilt beforeI have not gotten the pins pressed out yet. There is no copper visible in any of the big end saddles. But the rods were only machined on the side that rides against the other rod. I’m beginning to think that these particular rods were clad in order make up side clearance.
1.928 ch I think is the cast piston in the low compression 440Which 440 pistons will work in the 400? What compression height?
Yes, I've seen it in Chevy and Ford rods as well. Sometimes just on the small end and sometimes the big end, then the whole rod at times. According to some GM engineers I've spoken with, it was to keep from scraping rods that were bored too big on the B/E or S/E and otherwise being non conformance per the specs as 66fs mentioned. Just like the Maltese Cross stamp on many Mopar blocks denoting an odd oversize bore or rod journal size. Any attempt to keep the production moving forward.Copper is soft. It was a bandaid to save a nonconforming part. Big end of a rod? add weight? What happens when the copper peels off? Where does it go? With everybody pitching stock rods, someone should have a good set you could get. I'll go through my stash of parts. I know I have extra RB rod sets but I have to check on 383 rods.