I thought they needed 50 degrees of idle timing?.'the math' to build an engine that doesn't need 30* of idle timing.
I thought they needed 50 degrees of idle timing?.'the math' to build an engine that doesn't need 30* of idle timing.
Some big cammed engines do.......
Yawn...Keep them coming, we may get to 50 pages.Are you jealous or just envious... I Can't figure it out..or care to.
I do know you're on one hand saying to stay on topic, like the other sceen name as well.. yet you're bringing up some other thread as if it's relevant to the topic.. which is not about porting 302 heads.. it's about building a 318 engine and that just happens to be one of the parts involved in it. I swear..lol if you liked that connecting rod up your keister as much as you like that 302 head up there.. you would be saying this topic was about those connecting rods.
They can make some power after you put 'a couple grands time' port/valve work into them..but ultimately they aren't going to make 9's or support any 4" arm motors full potential...so that limits usage and puts them in a small box...318 or less cid unless your building a truck motor and aim for mpg's ...now remember the comment about CFM battle... that's all you're doing. That's you buddy... caught up in a flow number.
"Tiny port flows 240 cfm"
Let's break that down..
"Tiny port"=actually @/over 150cc now
"240 cfm"= what a bowl blended 1.88 j head does.
Not much wow factor left after it reaches the same size as a better flowing head. No more tiny, tiny.
I'm sure that 'maths" is sitting right next to "his dyno" which is right next to his "on again, off again" Ignore button.RB,
The 'smarter' person who claimed the switch to PVA was NOT emissions related was shown to be WRONG....like you.....so many times. Shrinker & Tuner are your heroes......& nowhere, repeat nowhere, does either of them, or Taylor, or Larew, or Smith repeat your bullshit that a larger MAB starts the main system sooner.
Meanwhile, we wait.......& wait or the non-existent 'math' you claim that allows an engine to be built that does not require 30* of idle timing.
Just full of bullshit.
Aww..you have nothing to say now.Yawn...Keep them coming, we may get to 50 pages.
I wish I would have flowed mine. I haven't ran it at the strip.I would like to hear some examples of cars and what they do run, and what the heads flows, like i have been this fast with a heads that flowed 200 @ .500 lift.
Well, it's just that you're a bit "low rent" that's all.Aww..you have nothing to say now.
That didn't take much.
With around 10-10.5:1 240@fifty .500-.550 lift with appropriate intake & exhaust about 1.9 hp per cfmI would like to hear some examples of cars and what they do run, and what the heads flows, like i have been this fast with a heads that flowed 200 @ .500 lift.
Well, it's just that you're a bit "low rent" that's all.
But I do laugh at you, if that's any consolation.
I should have issued a trigger warning when I posted the thread.......Polishing turds? could be..
But, it does seem to be upsetting a few, that's for sure.
Highly restrictive 135-155 cfm a lot of way to goHere is the 318 Dual Plane intake they have selected.
View attachment 1716033381
Charles did some flow tests on it and removed that bung that's sticking up.
Now he is going to start reworking it.
His comment: I have a lot of grinding to do.
Well, as they make flow bench's easier to build, you're going to get more "Saturday Night " porters come out of the woodwork with some sort of inferiority complex.I should have issued a trigger warning when I posted the thread.......
Highly restrictive 135-155 cfm a lot of way to go
From those that aren't interested.........Seems to be getting a lot of interest.
Those look like a good 273/318 head!Only 6 more postings, then this thread will hit the magic number of 1000 posts.
Seems to be getting a lot of interest.
View attachment 1716033385
Heart shaped chambers, that may be why people love them?
☆☆☆☆☆
From those that aren't interested.........
Here is the link to the: "First Look at the Dual Plane Intake" ^^^.
2,400 veiws now and counting.
☆☆☆☆☆