I agree 100%!Just think what can be done with their recipes with the heads available today.
FWIW Ma was conservative on the ET classes with certain combo's.
I agree 100%!Just think what can be done with their recipes with the heads available today.
FWIW Ma was conservative on the ET classes with certain combo's.
Just think if Mopar performance supported they're engines and cars still. (Affordably)I agree 100%!
This spring I had a customer who thought there was a problem with a BBM roller I’d sold him.Very interesting. Comp cams quality control has been in a downward spiral for a few years now.
Very good pointThis spring I had a customer who thought there was a problem with a BBM roller I’d sold him.
I had Comp run it thru the Adole 911 laser camshaft measuring machine……..way more accurate than a cam dr.
That particular cam measured out excellent, not just the lobe accuracy, but bearing roundness and runout, lobe runout, bank angle accuracy, etc………he had other issues.
What I found interesting is Eric was comparing data derived from two different machines.
I wonder if he would accept flow numbers from someone else’s bench, or if he’d want numbers from his own.
Oh wait, we know the answer to that.
I think the biggest take away, is if you dont measure it, you dont know for sure. Common sense really, but the vast majority of DIY engine builders and hobbyists look at the cam card and assume the cam is ground to those specs.I’m not saying that what Eric found is impossible, but If I were Joe Carrol I’d be sliding that cam in a block and measuring it up for myself.
Eric and Daniel (Powell machine) both said they see that a bunch from comp cams. I sure hope that isn’t true.I’m not saying that what Eric found is impossible, but If I were Joe Carrol I’d be sliding that cam in a block and measuring it up for myself.