Yea, I was really surprised. They were loose looseInteresting find on the mount bolts. I usually do spot checks on bolts but never thought to check those. I guess I need to now.
Yea, I was really surprised. They were loose looseInteresting find on the mount bolts. I usually do spot checks on bolts but never thought to check those. I guess I need to now.
That flange crossed my mind as well. You might be able to run a slightly undersize washer and deal with it that way. Would still act as a safety if it tried to lift, but it might move a bit before it hit the flange.I don't think that would work. The mount on the k-frame has a flange that captures the washer. The washer and flange on the mount are what actually keep the motor from lifting. Not sure there is room for the washer if I move the slot over. I could grind one side of the washer down to fit but that feels iffy as the washer would have to be oriented from then on when bolting the mount down.
I agree that I don't expect to ever go back to an LA.
One thing that hadn't occurred to me until this morning is I haven't even tried to twist the motor. It could be that it isn't square in the chassis and my 1/8" could all be because the header is pushing the back of the motor over. Something I now need to look into before I do anything. I might have to pull the motor and remove the header and see how it lands after that.
And yes, my brain is such that I can't just let go of this.
7mm (.2755) on the PS side. The 3rd bolt will have to be walked out with a wrench but not impossible. I may actually be doing it soon because I want to ditch the stock pushrods and put some beefier ones in. As much as I find the limiter, I figured it would be in my best interest to have some valve train rigidity.So my wife opened the garage door to get her car out and I couldn't help but step out and poke around some.
Here are some pictures of the mount and how the washer helps keep the motor locate.
View attachment 1716329974
View attachment 1716329975
I also tried to twist the motor and it feels very solid. So I don't think there is a twist that is causing the offset that I am measuring.
I also snapped some more pictures of the header to inner fender clearance and the clearance to the valve cover on the PS.
View attachment 1716329976
View attachment 1716329977
In addition, I grabbed some allen wrenches and used them to check clearances. Looks like the tightest spot on the header is about 7/64" clear and on the PS there is about 1/4" clear between the VC and the inner fender.
After looking at it some more, I am starting to wonder if Holley didn't intentionally slide the motor over 1/8" to gain some clearance for the VC. I've heard that can be a trouble spot and my brother on his '71 Demon build using Holley's billet VC had to notch his inner fender. So maybe I am good and am starting to lean towards not doing anything.
@racerjoe, how much clearance do you have on your PS valve cover? Ever tried to remove it with the motor in the car? @Dantra, too late to ask how close your VC was, but maybe you have an idea how my motor location compares to yours with the above pictures? @Map63Vette, any comparison info?
So you are running the TTI kit? And similar clearances, i honestly think adjusting the header would be the easiest option for him, as looks like could hug the block tighterMy PS VC is pretty close as well. I know I had to cut off the stud portion of the bolts for it to make it fit. I can't recall if I took a grinder and put a bit of a bevel on it or not though. I drove it to work today though, so I'll try to remember to grab some pictures. I did do a cam swap with the engine in the car, so the covers would have come off. They don't really need to lift up if you take the coils off first, they are pretty much flush mount with o-rings, so as long as you can get to the hardware I don't think that would be a problem. I have TTI headers and an older 5.7, but I'll have to look at the DS as well now just because I'm curious.