IF memory serves, that would be there smallest big block. It is not popular by any means what so ever. There isn’t much for them at all. Like our Poly engines. Good engines, not much out there to hop it up.
Negatory Ghostrider. The FE (Ford Edsel) line had the 332, 352, 360, 361, 390, 391, 406, 427 and 428. There was also the MEL offshoot of the FE family that consisted of the 383, 410, 430 and 462. They were FE engines too, but in the higher end Mercurys, Edsels and Lincolns (MEL)
ehhhh.....WHICH transmission? The only one I can think of that might fit that description is the C4. All the rest are about as bulletproof as a three speed auto can get. Mine has the B/W T18. Borg Warner's version of the NP435. Hardly glass.
I believe the 352 inch FE was in trucks a full size cars, there might have been one smaller....
I don't know WHY Ford ever put that in a truck. The lightest duty transmission they used should have been the FMX and then STRAIGHT to the C6. Even with the six cylinder engines.
No, they did it for emissions. Retarding camshaft timing removes bottom end torque.
Yes, see post #8.
I stopped trying to see the logic of Ford's engine "Families?" So Ford in the mid 60s made their most competitive big block. Their 427. Even a more higher technology SOHC Cammer version. They of course discontinued. And advanced their lower performance 390-460 line. Adding a Boss version of 429. That really under performed on the street/strip. So then came the 428 CJ. Not bad. But too late on the HP wars. And their small blocks? Even worse. 4 different versions of the 351. None are directly component swappable. And of course a 352. And that too is specific to that platform.
410 also. Kim
I said 410. It's in there. MEL
Negatory, it's an old farm truck, it's.had a.hard life by the looks of it. Running on 7 cylinders, barely got it up the ramp onto the dolly. It's a project that will keep me busy for a good long while. School bus yellow inside and out.
