cudavert
DARTAHOLIC
That's excellent! I thought the elevation would hurt you more than that! Plus, the fact that you hadn't sorted it all out yet would keep the power down. Way to go. Those heads must be great!
Guess my Dyno results
- Thread starter Rodzilla
- Start date
-
it's showing corrected numbers unless it a sheet unlike any other.
Applied a 10.2% correction factor.
Applied a 10.2% correction factor.
K.O. SWINGER
Meeting in the alley since 1976
so if you don't mind me asking how much doe have you got in that mill??
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
I will ask the dyno owner, he never mentioned and I didn't think to ask.
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
Off the top of my head about 13k from carb to pan. I actually spent about 2k more then that after being ripped off by a member here, in order to fix/replace some parts.
MRL Performance
Well-Known Member
Like I have been saying, those Lunati Voodoo solid roller cams KICK A$$$. Coupled with our lifters, its a win win for any Mopar.
Good job, its a real torque Monster!
It does look like its running fat. And why, may I ask, did you make the dyno runs at 140* oil and water temp? Your never going to see that on the street. When its in the car running 180+* your going to be running even fatter.
Good job, its a real torque Monster!
It does look like its running fat. And why, may I ask, did you make the dyno runs at 140* oil and water temp? Your never going to see that on the street. When its in the car running 180+* your going to be running even fatter.
Yes it is - the big "C" ahead of the HP & TQ readings indicate that it is the case.
That might have came off a little harsh, but if I had bolted on the indy heads on my motor, and ran more compression like yours I'd be disappointed.
challengergary
Well-Known Member
Dang! That's one nice small block! Are those the numbers at the wheels or was it on a run stand?
cudavert
DARTAHOLIC
604.7 H.P. - 10.2% = 542.4 H.P.
Ooooohh.....I WAS close!
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
It did, and I bolted on mystery heads (as far as porting and flow) because I was tired of sinking money into my car last year. I actually have no idea how much porting was even done, my guess the loser who sold them only polished off the rough cast. cc's for each head didn't match up, not even close so to save money we milled a few thou off one side to get it "close enough", and this took me out of the pump gas range. I think I will swap these heads next winter for pumpgas friendly ones. And he never sent me the intake at all so its a 50/50 rough cast in plenum/runners and my own port matching which aint bad. So for 604.7HP with this combo I was more then please
I guess that makes sense if the HP is corrected to sea level, then no matter where you live everyone is playing on an even field. Wonder what I actually get at my 2500', is it that 10.1% less like mentioned and where did that number come from crackedback?
I had an oil leak smoking up the dyno room as well, prolly didn't help my numbers sucking that it.
Find the line starting with "Baro"
The last piece of data in the line is C.F. (correction factor) = 1.102 That means the observed ratings where multipied by 1.102 or an increase of 10.2%
The last piece of data in the line is C.F. (correction factor) = 1.102 That means the observed ratings where multipied by 1.102 or an increase of 10.2%
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
Ahh yes, I get it now. Thanks
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
Its saying at sea level with perfect air I'd be at 604.7HP.
airwoofer
Drivetrain limit explorer
The motor will get run in the drag Demon next, no dyno planned but may put on a wideband bung and run it on a chassis dyno to verify the carb jetting with the new cam / heads.
K.O. SWINGER
Meeting in the alley since 1976
MAN ...congratulation, very BBB Bad ... how do I look in green!! lol
moper
Well-Known Member
590hp/575tq
lol.. I read the rest of the post after posting this...lol.
Not a bad set of numbers you got there.
lol.. I read the rest of the post after posting this...lol.
Not a bad set of numbers you got there.
Brian Hafliger
Well-Known Member
It did, and I bolted on mystery heads (as far as porting and flow) because I was tired of sinking money into my car last year. I actually have no idea how much porting was even done, my guess the loser who sold them only polished off the rough cast. cc's for each head didn't match up, not even close so to save money we milled a few thou off one side to get it "close enough", and this took me out of the pump gas range. I think I will swap these heads next winter for pumpgas friendly ones. And he never sent me the intake at all so its a 50/50 rough cast in plenum/runners and my own port matching which aint bad. So for 604.7HP with this combo I was more then please
I guess that makes sense if the HP is corrected to sea level, then no matter where you live everyone is playing on an even field. Wonder what I actually get at my 2500', is it that 10.1% less like mentioned and where did that number come from crackedback?
I had an oil leak smoking up the dyno room as well, prolly didn't help my numbers sucking that it.
Are these heads the Rect. port style? If so, and they were lightly hand ported then I'd say not too bad...if they were the cnc 230 Oval port heads...well that just can't be!
Brian
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
These are the 180cc non cnc'd oval ports. I'm assuming the 180cc because these weren't CNC'd and that is their only option for oval ports on Indys website. Below is a test sheet, allegedly from my heads, but sent from a guy who turns out would later rip me off. So who knows if they flow that well or not. When I had my machinist go thru the heads I found out the scumbag seller wasn't so hot with the diegrinder cause he messed up several off the valve jobs.
I few other pics of heads
Brian Hafliger
Well-Known Member
That's good power then based on those heads, and no they don't flow that much air! Those flow #'s are closer to the 230cc cnc ported ovals.
But still makes good power from a small port!
That would be why a bigger carb would maybe not help much. I'll bet there is 40+HP left in those heads so keep that in mind. Overall not too bad IMO.
Brian
But still makes good power from a small port!
That would be why a bigger carb would maybe not help much. I'll bet there is 40+HP left in those heads so keep that in mind. Overall not too bad IMO.
Brian
Rodzilla
Well-Known Member
Thanks for your input Brian, cheers.
.......................Good job...............being happy with the results is what counts........kim......
-
