Yeah, our GSD has about 45 pounds on the new kid. He's fast and probably a bit smarter, (but don't tell her I said that), the girl is remarkably nimble for her size and can out spin the King. We just have to make sure they don't get too zealous in their play.We faced the same issue introducing the Mal pup to our aging Eastern European GSD. For the most part they get along very well now, but it was precarious for a bit. The Pup is relentless with her pestering the big dog who is literally twice her weight and size. The pup is just a shade under sixty pounds and I doubt she will get any bigger. The play got a bit intense the other day and the pup turned on the “Mal switch” and tagged Hemi about three times on both sides of the head before Hemi even knew what was going on! The pup is deadly fast.
View attachment 1716097935
Oh my gosh the shimmy shake in the first video made me howl! That was hilarious. Hemi our GSD is also brighter than the pup, but is old enough now that she simply cannot keep up. We are giving her CBD oil for her hips trying to minimize the discomfort. The pup has already figured out the big dogs back end does not quite work right and attacks her ham strings like a heeler On a calf!Yeah, our GSD has about 45 pounds on the new kid. He's fast and probably a bit smarter, (but don't tell her I said that), the girl is remarkably nimble for her size and can out spin the King. We just have to make sure they don't get too zealous in their play.
I don't really need the vet bills.
Oh, and impressive teeth ya got there.
Yeah, the head shake. We were all surprised by that and that was when we KNEW he was ours.Oh my gosh the shimmy shake in the first video made me howl! That was hilarious. Hemi our GSD is also brighter than the pup, but is old enough now that she simply cannot keep up. We are giving her CBD oil for her hips trying to minimize the discomfort. The pup has already figured out the big dogs back end does not quite work right and attacks her ham strings like a heeler On a calf!
Agreed, we are also longtime GSD family. Kind of comes with the turf! Hemi has been on glucosamine for a couple of years now.Yeah, the head shake. We were all surprised by that and that was when we KNEW he was ours.
Having had GSD's almost all of our lives, I would recommend glucosamine or one of the derivatives (I think we use something like Cosequin.)
Sounds like a good time. A nice balance of pressure to meet the challenge, satisfy curiousity, and experience the differences.Long day on range today. We have been working with a church security team this week. Last night we did training sessions onsite in their church. Today was live fire range day for them. We have been training this Team for a couple of years now, they can shoot! Anyway the head of their team pulled me aside and explained he brought a bunch of FBI qualification targets and wanted me to run his crew thru the FBI protocol for qualification. It was a hoot, his guys did very well. Admittedly the standards are a bit low compared to Air Marshall etc but it is a great starting point. FBI revamped their test protocol in I think 19? But I ran the old one for them. They did great. It was a good time. It got the entrepreneur in me thinking that come fall I will gather up a bunch of federal qualifications targets and host a pretend “qual day” at the range. Let guests run a bunch of different quals, feed them, maybe do some raffles etc. I think it would be a blast? The tuff part will be explaining it is a “ pretend” qual as I clearly cannot officially run the drill. You can get the targets very easily. Mmmmmmmm?
Looks like a great grill quality control team there!
Man with that mob you could be a test sight for a vacuum cleaner company! No way you keep up when they molt in the summer!My guys, 3/4 of the menagerie. Cuda, Magnum, and Hemi. The one with the ears down is Magnum, the deaf one. Never has had his ears up, they don't work.
View attachment 1716101550
View attachment 1716101551
View attachment 1716101553
Found it. @Sublime one you know of these people. It wouldn't surprise me if you knew them personally.There's someone who has hosted something similar for historic LE qualifications. I can't recall where I read about it. Or maybe we talked about it.
I do in fact. Bullseye shooting is arguably one of the oldest disciplines in this country and once upon a time even had congressional legislation to back it up. I dabbled in bullseye as a result of so many bullseye shooters drifting over to our defensive handgun shooting Classes. I figured if I understood their game I would be a better instructor to them. It was a lot of fun but man o man, you want to talk about watching paint dry!Found it. @Sublime one you know of these people. It wouldn't surprise me if you knew them personally.
Anyway. It looks really cool. In the one video I peeked at, its not a full on experiment. The person closest to the camara was not using period techniques or firearms, although it wouldn't be surprising if some of the participants were.
[/URL]
Ok now that’s just plain funny. Not often a meme makes me laugh out loud but this was a great way to start my morning. I am totally stealing this and putting it in my keeper file!
All right boys and girls I have a genuine question to what I feel is a pretty good cross cut reflection of a typical 2A community right here on this thread. As most know we run a firearms training range and center, we primarily focus on church and school security as well as home defense and defensive shooting plus your normal trauma classes. What I am pondering is developing a two man curriculum for our students around the context of home defense. For all you Rambo’s out there I am not talking about teaching folks to become Green Beret breachers. What I am talking about is based on home defense, so it would typically be a husband and a wife comprising the two man team. I would center the curriculum around that. My question is, do you guys think that perhaps this kind of class would garner any interest? I Mean seriously when else can the Husband say emphatically he is right? Note: Rule number one is, First man is always right! Hah! Apologies for a bit of room clearing humor but many of you will get it.
@WV64Signet thanks so much for the response. Pure speculation on my part but I am envisioning our self defense students or security team folks taking the next step and encouraging their spouse or spiritual partner to join them in learning how to be a better protector for the ones they love. Not to say it cannot be Joe Shmoe off the street. Evolving the thought a bit does it make sense for both applicants to already be an alumni or provide proof of previous training? I think yes, no way I want a total noob with a gun in hand behind me with their hand on my shoulder. Or perhaps have it as a two day class? Day one, ensure student has fundamental platform of safety and marksmanship, then, day two meld the training from previous day into two man stuff? Your point about the kids in house was exactly where I was going with regard to making the class home defense based not “door kickers”. It is all about context, some folks use ARs to defend the house some use shotguns and some use pistols. But the one thing they will all use is a flashlight. So some low light training also makes sense. This thing is getting more complex the more my thought process evolves.Home defense planning sounds interesting. Not sure what your client pool might be. I can see planning and equipment selection (weapon and load choice)...
Not sure how 2-person team would resonate...especially with families having small children (e.g. moving through the house while kids by themselves....) not sure what momma might think of that. Intriguing thought.
@WV64Signet thanks so much for the response. Pure speculation on my part but I am envisioning our self defense students or security team folks taking the next step and encouraging their spouse or spiritual partner to join them in learning how to be a better protector for the ones they love. Not to say it cannot be Joe Shmoe off the street. Evolving the thought a bit does it make sense for both applicants to already be an alumni or provide proof of previous training? I think yes, no way I want a total noob with a gun in hand behind me with their hand on my shoulder. Or perhaps have it as a two day class? Day one, ensure student has fundamental platform of safety and marksmanship, then, day two meld the training from previous day into two man stuff? Your point about the kids in house was exactly where I was going with regard to making the class home defense based not “door kickers”. It is all about context, some folks use ARs to defend the house some use shotguns and some use pistols. But the one thing they will all use is a flashlight. So some low light training also makes sense. This thing is getting more complex the more my thought process evolves.
Totally agree on education. And while I teach a bunch of AR stuff, me personally that is a lot of gun for our home with occupants. I too go for a less energy choice. In our particular case it is a pump twenty. Let the haters hate!Yes to previous training and some sort of pre-qualification course of fire and stress test.
Education is key. I get people liking their AR but in MY house with other occupants I'm choosing something with much lower energy. Something like a reduced recoil 12ga. Know your target and know what's behind your target... that could be the next 4 or 5 trailers in the trailerhood as Toby Keith would say