If this was an old Detroit design piston with a .400"+ thick crown, then very likley 'yes'. But, these UEM pistons from the Icon and KB lines typically have been lightened up a lot with techniques like taking material out everywhere, including the piston crown. So I seriously doubt that the material is there to take out a .100"+ deep dish and keep anything close to an adequate crown thickness. And the weight would go down by over 40 grams if you cut out 17.5 cc's of AL, so the balance would indeed need to be re-worked.Can the current flat top pistons have a dish lathe turned? Trading labor for parts, but should be quick once the first one is set up.
That 'lack of useful power' is not directly explained by the excessive CR, unless the engine was perhaps detonating all the time. A 408 sure ought to have good power! Regardless, the CR situation needs to be address.So pistons sounds the most appealing to me. If I can run the engine just with new pistons I’ll be happy. I just have to make sure this WILL work and have some kind of useful power.
The set of magnum dished pistons could get him down to 9.3 SC and if that works with the current cam he could run it like that with his current push rods without the need for expensive gaskets or shims. I talked to another local Mopar guy and he also said 9.5 was about the limit on local pump gas with iron heads.Just a question
why not the KB Step dome KB356?
I helped design the predecessor to this piston just for OP's head 23.5cc
can mill the step dome off if going to closed chamber heads later
will take a trial assembly to get the gasket right for quench clearance dome to head if the heads have been milled much but down to .030 works and I've run smaller checking every chamber
Other choices are the ICONS for the magnum block
you get no quench but you do not have any anyway
(like B3 pointed our)
27 and 34cc plus .020 less compression height
do your math, play with the pins for the balance
Then ask the guys= there are some sharp builders on this site
cheers
No, your'e not overlooking a thing; that would work fine; good thinking IMHO! I don't think that the OP's engine would overwhelm that thinner pin.Catalogs
On page 27 of the Icon catalog it says the wrist pin for the IC745 piston is 0.984” x 2.75” and weighs 118 grams. On page 1 just below the table of contents the catalog shows light weight tool steel wrist pins. R-73 is listed as 0.984” x 2.75” and weighs 107 grams. That’s 11 grams lighter than the wrist pin that comes with the IC745 piston. Wouldn’t that be close enough to not have to rebalance or am I overlooking something?
Thank you for that info. That says (to me) to stick with a more modest cam to match the street driven application and reduce the SCR to match that and get the DCR under 8.Mostly street driven maybe once a year qaurter mile just to see what It can do
Honestly, the best way, money aside, is to drop that motor in a shipping crate and send it to a reputable engine builder to have it done. No offense to you at all, but what if you miss something else? You're already going to be into the motor for more than it would have cost for a builder to do it the first time. Let's face it, the money is an issue, or you wouldn't have asked for opinions on how to fix it without having to swap pistons. The thicker head gaskets will allow the compression to be lowered enough that there is no need for a $600 cam swap. You can use your existing cam.I’m just curious if everyone agrees with 67’s statement. Putting money aside which is the best, most proper way of going forward with this? If I decide to not think about money and do this once and only once.
E85 is not available in my locationHow available is e85 from the pump over there, could look at retuning it to suit and running it with a bit less timing?
I agree, a quench dome would be a good move. But, I'm still going back to the budgetary concern that was given near the start of this thread. He didn't have quench before, so the gasket is not going to make that any worse. Good grief, if the motor hadn't already been built I wouldn't have suggested a thick head gasket, although, I have used them in builds for specific reasons. But, that knowledge didn't come cheap, so I'll leave it at that.luv ya b3 but changing to a quench dome piston gives him some quench whereas a gasket change does not an ok budget move if he can come with a balance como
will he have to change pushrods with a super thick gasket?
IMHO yes but TBD
anyway at this point he has all the variables and seems sharp enough to figure it all out
as you say existing cam will be fine -work on 60 foot times
Off course changing the pistons or putting thick gaskets technology does the same thing...the difference is head shims or really thick gaskets are prone to leakage issues, especially on an engine that we have no idea on if the deck surfaces are decent. Does that sum it up For you Mr B3Honestly, the best way, money aside, is to drop that motor in a shipping crate and send it to a reputable engine builder to have it done. No offense to you at all, but what if you miss something else? You're already going to be into the motor for more than it would have cost for a builder to do it the first time. Let's face it, the money is an issue, or you wouldn't have asked for opinions on how to fix it without having to swap pistons. The thicker head gaskets will allow the compression to be lowered enough that there is no need for a $600 cam swap. You can use your existing cam.
Regardless of Mr 67's opinion, the gasket does the same thing as changing the pistons, and he still hasn't explained how gasket volume is different than piston volume. If you are still leery of the gaskets, call Cometic directly and ask their opinion. They have a reputation as the best Racing gasket manufacturer in North America, if not the world. They will give you a straight answer. I guarantee it's been done many times, for many reasons. It's your money, how far will it go?