junkyardhero
Well-Known Member
this. thank you for summing up everything i was going to say and spare everybody having to read it. and all in one sentence.273 said:everybody's level of compromise is different.
this. thank you for summing up everything i was going to say and spare everybody having to read it. and all in one sentence.273 said:everybody's level of compromise is different.
It's not only about compromise, it's about my idea being different from yours or anyone else's and yall's ideas being different than mine. Just because someone does something different, doesn't make it "wrong". How many times have we all seen a guy come on here saying I have "this" cam and I'm running "this" compression can you help me lake it work? The answer to that question is always a resounding YES. Yup, that cam they have might be way big for their compression, but it's what they HAVE. 10 times outta 10 if they listen and follow the advice of those here, it'll run and run better than they ever imagined. What some don't understand is, even when their advice is followed to the TEE matching this with that, there's always, always ALWAYS SOMETHING LEFT ON THE TABLE. Read that again. Something can ALWAYS be a "better" combination. Who was the guy on here recently who had a cam "too big" for the forum heros? @shittyslant6 wasn't it you? I think it was. He'll be a great example. That engine will run like gangbusters if he follows a few simple things...and I know he will because he's smart. The bottom line is, there's no ONE right way to do it. Your way, my way and someone else's way can all be the right way. Some people need to just shut up and get that through their thick skulls.this. thank you for summing up everything i was going to say and spare everybody having to read it. and all in one sentence.
Mr. Rod, or do you prefer Mr. Rat? Thank you for your balanced and thoughtful reply, we will forward this to the colleagues for their perusals on the matter and expect a judgement on the matter sometime in the near future.It's not only about compromise, it's about my idea being different from yours or anyone else's and yall's ideas being different than mine. Just because someone does something different, doesn't make it "wrong". How many times have we all seen a guy come on here saying I have "this" cam and I'm running "this" compression can you help me lake it work? The answer to that question is always a resounding YES. Yup, that cam they have might be way big for their compression, but it's what they HAVE. 10 times outta 10 if they listen and follow the advice of those here, it'll run and run better than they ever imagined. What some don't understand is, even when their advice is followed to the TEE matching this with that, there's always, always ALWAYS SOMETHING LEFT ON THE TABLE. Read that again. Something can ALWAYS be a "better" combination. Who was the guy on here recently who had a cam "too big" for the forum heros? @shittyslant6 wasn't it you? I think it was. He'll be a great example. That engine will run like gangbusters if he follows a few simple things...and I know he will because he's smart. The bottom line is, there's no ONE right way to do it. Your way, my way and someone else's way can all be the right way. Some people need to just shut up and get that through their thick skulls.
yeah Its a big *** isky .505 505 .292/292. 108lsa. 10.85:1 comprerssion (theoretically) and speedmaster 170cc heads.It's not only about compromise, it's about my idea being different from yours or anyone else's and yall's ideas being different than mine. Just because someone does something different, doesn't make it "wrong". How many times have we all seen a guy come on here saying I have "this" cam and I'm running "this" compression can you help me lake it work? The answer to that question is always a resounding YES. Yup, that cam they have might be way big for their compression, but it's what they HAVE. 10 times outta 10 if they listen and follow the advice of those here, it'll run and run better than they ever imagined. What some don't understand is, even when their advice is followed to the TEE matching this with that, there's always, always ALWAYS SOMETHING LEFT ON THE TABLE. Read that again. Something can ALWAYS be a "better" combination. Who was the guy on here recently who had a cam "too big" for the forum heros? @shittyslant6 wasn't it you? I think it was. He'll be a great example. That engine will run like gangbusters if he follows a few simple things...and I know he will because he's smart. The bottom line is, there's no ONE right way to do it. Your way, my way and someone else's way can all be the right way. Some people need to just shut up and get that through their thick skulls.
LOLMr. Rod, or do you prefer Mr. Rat? Thank you for your balanced and thoughtful reply, we will forward this to the colleagues for their perusals on the matter and expect a judgement on the matter sometime in the near future.
At this time, we request you keep doing things my way, the right way, and to my idea, because frankly that's the only way to do it; and no body can question that. i will, at request, lay forth the maths but frankly i think that there be no need for it at this time.
Much obliged,
-JYH LLC
It'll run good too. Don't let the fruitcakes convince you otherwise. Get the compression verified though, not theorized. That's important, but you already knew that.yeah Its a big *** isky .505 505 .292/292. 108lsa. 10.85:1 comprerssion (theoretically) and speedmaster 170cc heads.
stock crank, 318, old used circle track 340 rods, $50 dollar torker 340, I already had the cam kit and heads, hell I even had some old mahle main bearings and ARP rod bolts I found at pomona.
The only thing I will need to buy are lifters, headers, and some paint.
Is the cam too big for the street? probably. Is it cheaper than a new one? yes.
And it'll beat the **** out of my friends chevys.
the summit calculator said 10.85 and the crower calculator said 10.87. so It should be close to that especially with zero decking the block. I'll just retard the timing a touch on pump gas.It'll run good too. Don't let the fruitcakes convince you otherwise. Get the compression verified though, not theorized. That's important, but you already knew that.
You looky here hard head. Measure it! lolthe summit calculator said 10.85 and the crower calculator said 10.87. so It should be close to that especially with zero decking the block. I'll just retard the timing a touch on pump gas.
I will when I get back to assembling it, new job threw a wrench in the build.You looky here hard head. Measure it! lol
The skew here is, Today's 3,500-stall juicewheel ain't the same as Yo' Daddy's, let alone Yo' Grandpappy's. 3.91's??......where we goin', & what tire are We runnin'??this. thank you for summing up everything i was going to say and spare everybody having to read it. and all in one sentence.
we just runnin' some cheeze dick specials, let's say somewhere between 205/70-14 and 245/60-15 so something in the 26-ish range.The skew here is, Today's 3,500-stall juicewheel ain't the same as Yo' Daddy's, let alone Yo' Grandpappy's. 3.91's??......where we goin', & what tire are We runnin'??
Ahhh, You need a Corolla......we just runnin' some cheeze dick specials, let's say somewhere between 205/70-14 and 245/60-15 so something in the 26-ish range.
and we goin' to see your sister who lives on campus at college out of town. it's about an hour and a half drive in the middle of the night, mostly freeway. gas is $5 a gallon and i can't stand to lose much more of my hearing, let alone my mind. and my radio sucks, so it won't be loud enough to drown out the noise.
my man!Ahhh, You need a Corolla......
Having ran 4.89's w/275/60-15's, 4spd., 383 w/1 7/8" headers, no radio, no HVAC, no floor padding,.....I feel Ya'...that was close to 35yrs ago, would I do it now? NFW,...but it was fun at the time, lol!!!!!my man!
look, i'm all for 3500 stall and some 3.91's if it's just me and big nose bobby pounding around town or grabbing short john so we can get over to the DQ and meet up with big wendy and her lil' sis.
but sometimes i actually like to get out of this **** hole town, see the sights for a bit, know that there's more to this world and one day think about leaving this dump behind in my rearview.
and frankly my motor, sanity or pocket book can't take 3.91's on the highway. so i'll just have to come to terms with being embarrassed by kids in their mustangs at all the stop lights because i put a 4bbl on my wheeze bag 318 2bbl.
but i've got flow masters that dump at the axle so it sounds boss and i jacked the line pressure in the trans and it'll bark 2nd, so i've got that going for me.
Tolerances vary, plus Australia might had different specs only way to know for sure is measure, but it's probably more than stock spec if it says .056" probably more like .080"-.100" is what I've always heard.Wow! I sure did some responses that set off in all different directions! Maybe I will give more information and maybe someone that has pulled a 1972\1980 318 can give me an answer!
I have a 410 hot rod engine in my other car that runs low elevens and gets 23mpg on a run.
It is a 410 with 11/1 comp with forged pistons ,I beam rods, trick flow heads and a 340 victor port matched with 5 speed manual trans and 3.91 diff.
This is my other car that has 55000 miles on the clock and is a 1973 Australian Valiant charger 318 auto with air and steer and looks and drives like new with 95% factory original paint that is as good as the day it was built!
As a car like this is worth over $100 grand in aus I do not want to hot rod it but just keep it looking std but with a bit more poke. I have a spare set of heads that I have already worked on the ports and bowls and have ordered a set of 1.880 inlet valves and will be sending them to my head machinist that I have known for about forty years that will do a good 5 angle valve job and reduce the chambers to about 56CCs.
I am getting a roller camshaft and lifters for it but Mike at B3 needs to know a rough idea of compression to design a cam that idles like stock and has good low end response for me.
This car will have 360 exhaust manifolds and a 2.5 inch single system. The car at this time has a edelbrock performer manifold with an AVS2 500 on it but still sports the original 318 Fireball air cleaner that makes the engine bay look like stock.
I do not want to pull the heads off and let this car sit for months on end waiting for the parts to arrive from the USA.
All I am asking is has anyone measured how far in the whole was there 1971/1980 model 318 to find the average number that I can expect.
The small block mopar engines book that I have states the 1972 engines were .056 in the hole but I tend to think that they are generally further down and our Australian spec sheets on our 1973 318 says 8.2 to one compression. I will be machining down the heads to attempt to get about 56CCs and hopfully closer to near 9 to 1 comp.
Have a nice day!
What's in your Swinger, a "teen"?318s give me gas...there's always alot of "hot air" with 318 guys...LOL!
Mob mentality? And the 340/360/stroker guys aren't?A 318 will swap in yes and I've ran one in my Dart long ago, but I've since unloaded all my teens. I used to get them cheap or free so hanging on to them was sort of foolish. Like collecting scrap. I deleted my post I figured I didnt want to upset the folks here and get banned its a mob mentality here with 318s LOL!
I haven't seen a decent 340-360 thread on here that wasn't hijacked by 318 guys in a long time. But the thing is the 340-360 side of the argument is truly valid.Mob mentality? And the 340/360/stroker guys aren't?
Fixed !!!I haven't seen a decent 318 thread on here that wasn't hijacked by 340/360 guys in a long time.
They are all passionate about whatever is under the hood, and if you're smart, you will respect that.Well rename it the 318 slant 6 forum then