The earlier Buick 231's had the same oil pump configuration. They changed it to a gerotor pump on the crankshaft, injected the engine and made it into something dependable.
The Buick 350 was the most prolific engine used in that time period, because they had an enormous Amount of them left over. I'd MUCH rather have a Buick 350 than a Chevy 350 any day anyway. Way more torquey. The only "weak" spot on the Buick V8 was the timing cover. It was a high wear item, because everything mounted on it. Distributor, water pump, fuel pump and I think even the oil pump body was an integral part of the timing cover. There was a lot of action goin on in the Buick timing cover, but they were really good engines.
The early GMC truck V6s were from 305 all the way to 478 cubes.I owned (well, my mom and me) two of them. A 70 4 barrel in a lesabre and a 72 2 barrel in a skylark.
The v6 in those mid 60's gmc trucks was 304 cubic inches IIRC. Looked like a V8 except for the spark plug and exhaust port count.
I know, right? loloh the horror... plymouth and one dodge.. same truck, different name.
View attachment 1716045185
View attachment 1716045186
And it is an excellent traction device, works kinda like a long ladder bar. Nascar stockers still use a variant today.Actually no, GMC also used the long control arm/coil spring rear suspension on 1/2 tons in that era. Worked on lots of them, and buddy of mine has owned at least 7 or 8, still has a 71 GMC 1/2 ton with that setup. Does make for a much better ride than parallel leaf springs and can still haul a decent amount of weight.
Back then and all the way up to the new century I thought the chevys looked better than the gmc`s, I own 2 GMC`s .yes, but not always the Advance design Chevy truck style of 1947-55 the GMC had its own engine I think it was a "Bigger six"
I always find it amusing that someone asks a question and the first thing someone can think of is homosexuality. It's what our younger generation would describe as "a little sus"I have a 96 GMC Suburban and a 99 Yukon. I love them. If that makes me a homo, then so be it. I still love my Mopars tho.
I am 28, we like to call that, Small Dick energy.I always find it amusing that someone asks a question and the first thing someone can think of is homosexuality. It's what our younger generation would describe as "a little sus"
Yes...Is Dodge a dressed-up version of Plymouth?
I owned (well, my mom and me) two of them. A 70 4 barrel in a lesabre and a 72 2 barrel in a skylark.
The v6 in those mid 60's gmc trucks was 304 cubic inches IIRC. Looked like a V8 except for the spark plug and exhaust port count.
In the early 80s my brother picked up from a coworker a '67 GMC 1 ton (I guess that would make it a 3500) flatbed dually with a 351 V6, 4 speed, and Detroit locker. It got horrible gas mileage but nowadays would be a cool truck to find again. Dad bought it from my brother, then Dad sold it in the late 80s.The early GMC truck V6s were from 305 all the way to 478 cubes.
Those engines all had a really unique sound.In the early 80s my brother picked up from a coworker a '67 GMC 1 ton (I guess that would make it a 3500) flatbed dually with a 351 V6, 4 speed, and Detroit locker. It got horrible gas mileage but nowadays would be a cool truck to find again. Dad bought it from my brother, then Dad sold it in the late 80s.
No kidding. I had a 98 Dakota Sport with the 4 cylinder and a 5 speed. I really loved that truck. I drove it for many problem free years. A few years ago, Dodge said they were coming back out with the Dakota. Of course, even if they did, it would probably be 90 or 95% as big as a full-size Ram half ton with Dodge (or Ram or whatever) bragging about their new "compact" truck.I've owned three Dakotas, my mom has owned two Dakotas, my brother in law has owned 2 Dakotas, and a close friend of the family has owned two Dakotas and a Durango.
Man, I miss the Dakota.
When and if it comes back, I hope it's not a weak representation.