An open chamber head with a flat top piston or a closed chamber head with a dish piston. Both at 10.5:1 compression.
Second one especially if the the piston mirrors the chamber. like in this thread:An open chamber head with a flat top piston or a closed chamber head with a dish piston. Both at 10.5:1 compression.
An open chamber head with a flat top piston or a closed chamber head with a dish piston. Both at 10.5:1 compression.
I have to ask, was that you dyno testing in 1980 that made St Helens blow.If you stick the piston out of the block like Chrysler said to do 55 plus years ago it doesn’t make a pinch of **** difference.
In fact, I can argue that the original SBM chamber is better than 90% of the **** that gets palmed off as the latest, greatest thing.
The MOST timing you should need on a SBM is 36, and that engine is probably low on compression and over cammed.
A lot of the guys out there today claiming their chambers will run at 34 (or less) run a far hotter plug than they should.
Chrysler did it. The 340. Remember that one?Besides; how do you get to 10.5 with a flat top and an open chamber?
I have to ask, was that you dyno testing in 1980 that made St Helens blow.
I heard it was caused by engine testing I'm just trying to pinpoint it.
We've had a few earthquakes over here in the past few years.
Here is a good article on quench from Engine Labs.
[/URL]
Hotter sparkplugs CAN burn more fuel (or burn fuel better so more can be added), so if done right will make more power...within reason.If you stick the piston out of the block like Chrysler said to do 55 plus years ago it doesn’t make a pinch of **** difference.
In fact, I can argue that the original SBM chamber is better than 90% of the **** that gets palmed off as the latest, greatest thing.
The MOST timing you should need on a SBM is 36, and that engine is probably low on compression and over cammed.
A lot of the guys out there today claiming their chambers will run at 34 (or less) run a far hotter plug than they should.
Guess that means the more you improve the burn the less timing it needs........NA you do everything you can to speed up the burn rate because faster is better
What do you think about this chamber and plug placement?Thats a very good article.
The first thing that really stood out was that first picture that was posted showing quench area. While the chamber shape is nice, spark plug location is not that good. And for most 23 degree SBC heads it’s never very good.
My point is even with proper quench (if you can get it and not get the compression ratio higher than needed) some of these chambers have only decent to horrible spark plug locations.
And spark plug location is a HUGE factor in ignition spark angle (timing).
https://www.speednik.com/files/2019...iston-and-head-2019-03-23_15-55-21_659850.jpg
View attachment 1716055386
I couldn’t get the picture of the Chevy head from the article to post but you can click on the link to see it.
Compare the spark plug location of both heads and you‘ll notice how high up in the chamber the Chrysler plug is compared to the Chevy chamber.
That high plug placement means less total timing and a completely different curve than the SBC head. Also, you can get a bigger dome in the Chrysler before the flame front is impeded than you can with the SBC, or even the BBC.
As Darin Morgan says, NA you do everything you can to speed up the burn rate because faster is better (to a point) but with a power adder you do whatever you can to SLOW the burn rate down to keep it out of detonation.
Guess that means the more you improve the burn the less timing it needs........
Hotter sparkplugs CAN burn more fuel (or burn fuel better so more can be added), so if done right will make more power...within reason.
What do you think about this chamber and plug placement?
View attachment 1716055792