Lightweight flywheel options and selection criteria.

-
G

gzig5

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
4,459
Location
Mequon, WI
I've dropped the 340 block with the builder and we are going with a much lighter piston/rod combo on the stock stroke crank than the L2613 pistons I had originally planned for. It should rev quickly and run smoothly. The used OEM flywheel I picked up for the four speed conversion is usable but has some heat stress cracks. He's suggested going with a lighter flywheel and now I'm a bit unsure on which option to go with for my application. Stock units are about 30lbs, plus or minus. The light weight steel units come in around 20-22lbs. The LW aluminum units are 12-14lbs. So far I've got a Mcleod 10.5" Super Pro Street clutch kit and A833 and 3.55 gears behind it. Engine will be a 340 with heads and cam to support 450-475hp in a ~3700lb E-body. I will have a lot of street driving with autocross and road course track days as much as possible. Might hit the drag strip from time to time but that is not the focus of the build. 3.91/4.10 gear and Gear Vendor or TKX may come down the road after I've got some mile on it.

Now the OEM made them that weight for a reason and racers make them lighter for other reasons. Usually a compromise with one or the other not doing everything well. Looking for suggestions on general weight class to go with and specific model recommendations or ones to stay away from. I'm leaning towards the middle ground 20lb class steel ones. Ram has one that is about $300 new and I would think should do what I'm looking for. Does that sound about right or should I be looking harder at the aluminum ones? My thought is that the 12lb unit with less inertia, would not be as competent on the street in the off idle area.
 
Wayyyyyyyyy back I had a 340 in a early dart and I used the 10 inch (9 1/4) flywheel to lighten the load and it was just about too light but it worked well with a 4.10 and a 3.09 first gear. I think you should use a std. flywheel with your combo.
 
RustyRatRod said:
I don't like aluminum for any application.
Click to expand...
Me neither! There's an aluminum Centerforce just sitting in my shed that has half a summer on it. What I hated most was the "lurchiness" at slow speeds. Not to mention, I could never get a consistent launch with the damn thing.
 
Dan Brewer said:
I wouldn't use an aluminum wheel on the street.
If you want light weight steel: FLYWHEEL 10.5" 6-BOLT V8-RAM-LIGHTWEIGHT 130 T - Mopar A833 4-Speed Transmission & Component Specialists
Flywheels store energy. Lighter wheels will allow the engine RPM to pull down easier when you start to engage the clutch.
Have a read here also, direct from the Ram website: CLUTCH UNIVERSITY – CHAPTER 4 - RAM Clutches
Click to expand...
Good stuff. That's the one I was thinking of. I want it to rev best it can but I don't want it to be difficult to drive around town, which I intend to do regularly when the weather allows. Some good evening reading for me. Thank you.
 
For your application I would use the 20 lb steel.
I did run a 12 lb aluminum wheel behind a 370hp LT1 in my 57 chevy, and I LOVED it! It revved so quick it was amazing, and I was still running the plastic 8.2 dropout rear end, so I did NOT need the heavy flywheel transferring a lot of torque. And the 4.56 gear helped too. A scattershield was ABSOLUTELY MANDATORY.
The light flywheel helps with acceleration as well, especially in the lower gears. Much more so than even lightweight engine internals.
Imo, a heavy wheel is only necessary for a car with almost no gear (2.76/2.91, etc)
Edit: whatever you get, get an SFI approved version. (Have you ever seen a flywheel/clutch explosion? I have. UGLY!)
Edit2: I heartily endorse a scattershield too. Most racing sanctioning bodies require one, or should.
 
Last edited:
The lighter your flywheel the deeper the rear gear you'll need to run, or it'll fall flat on it's face when you try to launch. If you need to run a semi street-friendly gear, you can get by with a middle ground flywheel. Highway gears, heavy flywheel.
Stay away from aluminum flywheels that don't have a ferrous friction surface (not sure if they even make those anymore, maybe I'm dating myself...)
And definitely yes to a scattershield (with block plate) if you intend to turn some RPMs with this thing. But if you weren't intending to do that, you wouldn't be building it this way and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
 
Aluminum flywheel= road racing/autocross
Lightweight steel= drag racing
Heavy steel (stock) = street car

My experience.
 
Newbomb Turk said:
With your gearing and power there is no way I’d run a steel flywheel.

It’s not 1975 any more.
Click to expand...
I think it’s more application dependent than anything else. With his gearing and hp in a street car I absolutely would run a steel flywheel. If his engine was in a Miata road racing I’d wouldn’t run anything but a super light aluminum.
 
i ran a lightweight aluminum wheel from 10,000 rpm behind my 318 in the 64 and 65 darts. commando box (3.09 1st) and 3.55's out back.

absolutely wonderful on the road course and auto-x. a real chore to drive on the street. with a race style on/off clutch it was nearly undriveable in traffic.

i'd steer away from a full aluminum wheel and go with a lighter than stock steel unit for your application.
 
Thanks for the feedback, this is really what I was hoping to get. Real street experience with the options. While the track performance of a flyweight flywheel is very desirable, reasonable street driving manners are higher priority. I am planning on driving the car nearly every day in the warmer months and I don't want to be taming a bucking bronco. As I suspected, the lighter you go the less fluid it would be for tame street driving. I try not to drive like a 19yr old BMW owner most days around home. :p As with everything in life, there are compromises and for me I'm going to lean to the street side at this point in the car's life. I've got time to ponder the question but hope to have the car back together (it's currently stripped and missing roof, quarters, and tail panel) and running by this fall. I will give the 22lb one a try, but probably wait until I go to a 3.91 or 4.10 rear gear. Car was an automatic so I'm setting up the four speed from scratch and want to have as much forgiveness in the system as possible while debugging engine/trans/clutch, so starting with the OEM 30 pounder might be the better course of action. I'm not afraid to go back in and change things. I have a loose schedule of upgrades and fuel systems to try in coming years. But need to get it moving under power first.
 
I run a Mcleod 22lb sfi behind the 408 in my Swinger . W2 heads 246/250 on 108 cam and 3.91 gears. No issues street driving . A 3.09 first gear would make it perfect !
 
Like @mbaird, I too ran a 22lb McLeod lightweight steel in my W2 408 Swinger. When I had my 3.09 box in my car, it was great with 3.55 gears. With 3.23, it wasn't the best, but I now blame a lot of that on the McLeod RXT clutch, which has no modulation whatsoever, either on or off. At this time, I went back to a 30lb wheel. Definitely caused the engine to spin up slower.

Currently, I am finishing the installation of an aluminum 14lb wheel from RAM Clutches and 4.10 geared Dana 60, with aluminum driveshaft. All of this will be coupled to a McLeod borg beck and long pressure plate and organic disc. After searching around the net for info on aluminum flywheels, I came across Jody Haag, of Jody's transmissions. His advice when contemplating an aluminum wheel on the street is the necessity of 11:1 ratio in first gear. He claims this is a minimum, less than this and it likely won't be happy. I also spoke with FABO member @perfacar, who also agreed aluminum was the way to go.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top