You're right I don't have numbers. Please show me yours.
Cars, Scooters and E-Bikes Catching Fire: Problem or Perception?What I am saying is that YOU have nothing to base this on, and IF YOU WERE to estimate the problem out to "let's say" an equal no. of gas/ vs evs on the road, I think you are gonna find that ev fires are one HELL of a lot more of a problem. When was the last time you read a news report of a gas vehicle blowing up for no reason, just sitting there parked? When was the last time you read about a gas vehicle that the fire crew had a tremendous difficulty putting out?
There's LOTS of stuff that can be outright dangerous and deadly if not properly controlled, from LPG to natural gas and on and on. But so far, what I AM NOT hearing from the gobt OR manufacturers, is some safety measures to control EV batteries.
Yup. That'll do it.I have an easy fix for that. Simply don't buy any of those pieces of ****.
View attachment 1716118477
Yeah well, THAT ain't hard to figure out. lol
Statistics never lie, yet all liars use statistics,....Wow, 2 paragraphs full of data... Not.
But let me make more factual changes to it:
"EVs are new and different, and their fires posesomemany challenges for first responders, so some coverage makes sense; we ourselves cover unusual or noteworthy instances. But if electric vehicles are no more likely to catch fire than any other car on the road, the headline frequency can be misleading. In fact, the data says they account for a *tiny fraction of all car fires*." Note: they still represent a fraction of cars on the road."
There was two paragraphs on the first page. Did you read the rest of the article?Wow, 2 paragraphs full of data... Not.
But let me make more factual changes to it:
"EVs are new and different, and their fires posesomemany challenges for first responders, so some coverage makes sense; we ourselves cover unusual or noteworthy instances. But if electric vehicles are no more likely to catch fire than any other car on the road, the headline frequency can be misleading. In fact, the data says they account for a *tiny fraction of all car fires*." Note: they still represent a fraction of cars on the road."
There was two paragraphs on the first page. Did you read the rest of the article?
Well "some" just don't get it. But he's now on ignore, I got better things to do.Yeah well, THAT ain't hard to figure out. lol
LOL That's a great comparison. I gotta remember that one.Car people can’t even have a discussion about EVs without it turning to crap. EV is the blow up doll of the car culture. If you love it please keep it to your self.
Did it ever occur to you that that "data" is flawed, and possibly for several reasons. One is the reason I mentioned, there is is simply way too many fuel powered vehicles vs EV to even form a comparison, and the other is POLITICS. We all "know" that politcians and business would NEVER skew statistics!!!There was two paragraphs on the first page. Did you read the rest of the article?
I did say "Believe it or not"Did it ever occur to you that that "data" is flawed, and possibly for several reasons. One is the reason I mentioned, there is is simply way too many fuel powered vehicles vs EV to even form a comparison, and the other is POLITICS. We all "know" that politcians and business would NEVER skew statistics!!!
Maybe....Did it ever occur to you that that "data" is flawed, and possibly for several reasons. One is the reason I mentioned, there is is simply way too many fuel powered vehicles vs EV to even form a comparison, and the other is POLITICS. We all "know" that politcians and business would NEVER skew statistics!!!
It wouldn't matter what the data showed if it doesn't agree with what people believe they will dismiss it.Maybe....
They could use the "per capita" type of statistic to fine tune it down to the gnat's ***...
Don't look at the percentages of EV versus gas fires, look at the amount of EVs on fire versus the amount sold and owned, then compare that to the same figures with gas and diesel cars.
If 1 in 100 EVs catch fire and 1 in 1000 gas/diesel cars burn, THERE is your evidence.
If you are so keen on owning one, go right ahead. Also consider not bragging about it to people that are NOT at all interested in them.It wouldn't matter what the data showed if it doesn't agree with what people believe they will dismiss it.
I said that fires in both iCE and EV cars are dangerous. I don't see that as bragging. When the subject of EVs comes up often someone will add to the conversation that EV cars are dangerous because they catch fire. I agree with that statement. But so are ICE cars.If you are so keen on owning one, go right ahead. Also consider not bragging about it to people that are NOT at all interested in them.
ICE cars don't spontaneously ignite, EVs do. That's the issue I'd be most concerned about, but I'll never own one because they do nothing for me.I said that fires in both iCE and EV cars are dangerous. I don't see that as bragging. When the subject of EVs comes up often someone will add to the conversation that EV cars are dangerous because they catch fire. I agree with that statement. But so are ICE cars.
I love ICE cars. I have spent my entire adult life working on, racing and building ICE engines. But I'm not going to let my love for these engines blind me from the fact that gasoline is dangerous and can kill you. It would be nice if neither Ice or ev had the potential to catch fire but for now that doesn't seem to be the case.
Even if someone will agree that gasoline is dangerous the conversion quickly shifts to "which is more dangerous?". I don't know the answer to that and I suppose it depends on the criteria used to define dangerous. Is it going to be number of people killed? Injured? dollars worth of damage? which is harder to put out?
If it turns out that one is only slightly safer than the other does it really matter?
If you're not interested in EV vehicles so be it, but you are taking time to read and post in a thread that is about EV vehicles.
Since we both are on the subject of EV'S, I think your idea of comparing number of cars bought vs number of cars burned is a smart way to look at the data. If i understand you correctly it would go like this.
Xx,*** ev vehicles were purchased in the usa in 2022. Xx ev vehicles caught fire. Equaling a 1 in xxxx chance of a fire.
X,***,*** ice vehicles were purchased in the usa in 2022. X,*** vehicles caught fire. Equaling a 1 in *** chance of a fire.
Sometimes you have to talk down to their level.Yes...If 100,000 EVs sold have 1000 fires, that is 1 in a hundred.
If 5 million gas/diesel cars sold have 1000 fires, that is 1 in 500,000.
I am BEYOND tired of people using the term ICE to describe gasoline cars. It always looks like someone trying to be trendy or thinking that they impress others. Screw all that. The overwhelming majority of them are GASOLINE powered, only a small percentage are diesel.